Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27091043›Full record

ArticleJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2016

Evaluation of the osteogenesis and angiogenesis effects of erythropoietin and the efficacy of deproteinized bovine bone/recombinant human erythropoietin scaffold on bone defect repair.

Donghai Li, Liqing Deng, Xiaowei Xie, Zhouyuan Yang, Pengde Kang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Research progress of vascularization strategies of tissue-engineered bone.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  4. Hypoxia-Inducible Factors Signaling in Osteogenesis and Skeletal Repair.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Donghai LiDepartment of Orthopaedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37# Wainan Guoxue Road, Chengdu, 610041, People's Republic of China.
Liqing DengDepartment of Orthopaedics, Hospital of Chengdu Office of People's Government of Tibetan Autonomous Region, 20# Ximianqiaoheng Street, Chengdu, 610041, People's Republic of China.
Xiaowei XieDepartment of Orthopaedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37# Wainan Guoxue Road, Chengdu, 610041, People's Republic of China.
Zhouyuan YangDepartment of Orthopaedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37# Wainan Guoxue Road, Chengdu, 610041, People's Republic of China.
Pengde KangDepartment of Orthopaedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37# Wainan Guoxue Road, Chengdu, 610041, People's Republic of China. kangpd@163.com.
West China Hospital of Sichuan University · CNSichuan University · CNTibet Autonomous Region People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Erythropoietin (EPO) could promote the angiogenesis and may also play a role in bone regeneration. This study was conducted to evaluate the osteogenesis and angiogenesis effects of EPO and the efficacy of deproteinized bovine bone/recombinant human EPO scaffold on bone defect repair. Twenty-four healthy adult goats were chosen to build goat defects model and randomly divided into four groups. The goats were treated with DBB/rhEPO scaffolds (group A), porous DBB scaffolds (group B), autogenous cancellous bone graft (group C), and nothing (group D). Animals were evaluated with radiological and histological methods at 4, 8 and 12 weeks after surgery. The grey value of radiographs was used to evaluate the healing of the defects and the outcome revealed that the group A had a better outcome of defect healing compared with group B (P < 0.05). However, the grey values in group A were lower than group C at week 4 and week 8 (P < 0.05), but at week 12 their difference had no statistical significance (P > 0.05). The newly formed bone area was calculated from histological sections and the results demonstrated that the amount of new bone in group A increased significantly compared with that in group B (P < 0.05) but was inferior to that in group C (P > 0.05) at 4, 8, 12 weeks respectively. In addition, the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) by immunohistochemical testing and real-time polymerase chain reaction at 12 weeks in group A was significantly higher than that in group B (P < 0.05), and also better than that in group C at week 4 and week 8 (P < 0.05), but at week 12 their difference had no statistical significance (P > 0.05). Therefore, EPO has significant effects on bone formation and angiogenesis, and has capacity to promote the repair of bone defects. It is worthy of being recommended to further studies.

Indexed as

Bone and BonesAnimalsBone DevelopmentBone SubstitutesCattleCell ProliferationErythropoietinFracture HealingGoatsHumansNeovascularization, PhysiologicOsteogenesisRecombinant ProteinsTibiaTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsBone SubstitutesErythropoietinRecombinant ProteinsBone defectDeproteinized bovine boneErythropoietinVascular endothelial growth factor

Identifiers

PMID27091043
OpenAlexW2341755468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.