Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27090889›Full record

ArticleJournal of nanobiotechnology2016

Nanoaerosols reduce required effective dose of liposomal levofloxacin against pulmonary murine Francisella tularensis subsp. novicida infection.

Crystal N Propst, Albert O Nwabueze, Igor L Kanev, Rachel E Pepin, Bradford W Gutting, Victor N Morozov, Monique L van Hoek

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Genetic Determinants of Antibiotic Resistance inFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Crystal N PropstSchool of Systems Biology and National Center for Biodefense and Infectious Diseases, George Mason University, MS1H8, Manassas, VA, 20110, USA.
Albert O NwabuezeSchool of Systems Biology and National Center for Biodefense and Infectious Diseases, George Mason University, MS1H8, Manassas, VA, 20110, USA.
Igor L KanevInstitute of Theoretical and Experimental Biophysics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Pushchino, Moscow Region, 142290, Russia.
Rachel E PepinSchool of Systems Biology and National Center for Biodefense and Infectious Diseases, George Mason University, MS1H8, Manassas, VA, 20110, USA.
Bradford W GuttingCBR Concepts and Experimentation Branch (Z21), Dahlgren Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center, Dahlgren, VA, 22448, USA.
Victor N MorozovSchool of Systems Biology and National Center for Biodefense and Infectious Diseases, George Mason University, MS1H8, Manassas, VA, 20110, USA.
Monique L van HoekSchool of Systems Biology and National Center for Biodefense and Infectious Diseases, George Mason University, MS1H8, Manassas, VA, 20110, USA. mvanhoek@gmu.edu.
George Mason University · USInstitute of Theoretical and Experimental Biophysics · RUNaval Surface Warfare Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Biophysics in Moscow recently developed a new nanoaerosol generator. This study evaluated this novel technology, which has the potential to enhance therapeutic delivery, with the goal of using the generator to treat pulmonary Francisella tularensis subsp. novicida (F. novicida) infections in BALB/c mice.

resultsFirst, the analysis of quantum dots distribution in cryosections of murine lungs demonstrated that nanoaerosols penetrate the alveoli and spread more homogenously in the lungs than upon intranasal delivery. Second, the generator was used to aerosolize the antibiotic levofloxacin to determine the effectiveness of nanoaerosolized levofloxacin as treatment against F. novicida. The generator was capable of delivering a sufficient dose of nanoaerosolized liposome-encapsulated levofloxacin to rescue mice against 100LD50 of F. novicida.

conclusionsThe nanoaerosol-delivered dosage of liposome-encapsulated levofloxacin required to rescue mice is approximately 94× lower than the oral required dose and approximately 8× lower than the intraperitoneal dose required for rescue. In addition, treatment with nanoaerosols consumes less total volume of therapeutic solutions and is gentler on sprayed material than the aerosolization by a conventional three-jet Collison nebulizer as seen by the preservation of liposomes. This could represent a significant advance for the use of expensive therapeutics and lung directed therapies.

Indexed as

AerosolsAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsFrancisella tularensisLevofloxacinLiposomesLungMiceMice, Inbred BALB CNanoparticlesTularemiaAerosolsAnti-Bacterial AgentsLevofloxacinLiposomesAerosolAnimal modelFrancisellaLevofloxacinNanoaerosolPulmonary infection

Identifiers

PMID27090889
PMCPMC4835885
OpenAlexW2336063632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.