Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27090821›Full record

SynthesisSleep medicine reviews2017

Qualitative studies of insomnia: Current state of knowledge in the field.

Taís Araújo, Denise C Jarrin, Yvan Leanza, Annie Vallières, Charles M Morin

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sleep medicine reviews, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Short-term sleep benefitsFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. A patient first perspective of sleep disturbance across therapeutic areas: a systematic literature review of qualitative studies.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Taís AraújoÉcole de psychologie, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada; Centre d'étude des troubles du sommeil, Centre de recherche de l'Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Québec, Québec, Canada. Electronic address: tais.araujo.1@ulaval.ca.
Denise C JarrinÉcole de psychologie, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada; Centre d'étude des troubles du sommeil, Centre de recherche de l'Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Québec, Québec, Canada.
Yvan LeanzaÉcole de psychologie, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada; Laboratoire Psychologie et Cultures, Québec, Québec, Canada.
Annie VallièresÉcole de psychologie, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada; Laboratoire Psycho|Socio|Culturel du sommeil, Centre de recherche de l'Institut en santé mentale de Québec, Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec, Québec, Canada.
Charles M MorinÉcole de psychologie, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada; Centre d'étude des troubles du sommeil, Centre de recherche de l'Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Québec, Québec, Canada.

Funding

2/2-Sequenced Therapies for Comorbid and Primary InsomniasR01MH091053 · NIMH · LAVAL UNIVERSITY · PI MORIN, CHARLES M. · 2011 to 2015
$882k
CIHR BO512201CIHR MOP42504NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH091053
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite its high prevalence and burden, insomnia is often trivialized, under-diagnosed, and under-treated in practice. Little information is available on the subjective experience and perceived consequences of insomnia, help-seeking behaviors, and treatment preferences. The use of qualitative approaches (e.g., ethnography, phenomenology, grounded theory) may help gain a better understanding of this sleep disorder. The present paper summarizes the evidence derived from insomnia studies using a qualitative research methodology (e.g., focus group, semi-structured interviews). A systematic review of the literature was conducted using PsycINFO and Medline databases. The review yielded 22 studies and the quality of the methodology of each of them was evaluated systematically using the critical appraisal skills programme (CASP) appraisal tool. Selected articles possess at least a very good methodological rigor and they were categorized according to their main focus: "Experience of insomnia", "Management of insomnia" and "Medicalization of insomnia". The main findings indicate that: 1) insomnia is often experienced as a 24-h problem and is perceived to affect several domains of life, 2) a sense of frustration and misunderstanding is very common among insomnia patients, which is possibly due to a mismatch between patients' and health care professionals' perspectives on insomnia and its treatment, 3) health care professionals pay more attention to sleep hygiene education and medication therapies and less to the patient's subjective experience of insomnia, and 4) health care professionals are often unaware of non-pharmacological interventions other than sleep hygiene education. An important implication of these findings is the need to develop new clinical measures with a broader scope on insomnia and more targeted treatments that take into account the patient's experience of insomnia. Greater use of qualitative approaches in future research may produce novel and more contextualized information leading to a more comprehensive understanding of insomnia.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansQualitative ResearchSleep Initiation and Maintenance DisordersInsomniaQualitative researchSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID27090821
PMCPMC4945477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.