Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27090756›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2016

Tick-borne pathogens of zoonotic and veterinary importance in Nigerian cattle.

Vincenzo Lorusso, Michiel Wijnveld, Ayodele O Majekodunmi, Charles Dongkum, Akinyemi Fajinmi, Abraham G Dogo, Michael Thrusfield, Albert Mugenyi, Elise Vaumourin, Augustine C Igweh and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review of Molecular Tools Used in Diagnosis ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Genetic Characterization of the RAP-1A and SBP-4 Genes ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  12. Tick-Borne Diseases of Humans and Animals in West Africa.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Molecular identification ofIranian journal of microbiology · 2023
    Article
  15. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Vincenzo LorussoDivision of Infection and Pathway Medicine, School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Michiel WijnveldUtrecht Centre for Tick-borne Diseases, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Ayodele O MajekodunmiDivision of Infection and Pathway Medicine, School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Charles DongkumNigerian Institute for Trypanosomiasis Research, VOM, Jos, Plateau, Nigeria.
Akinyemi FajinmiNigerian Institute for Trypanosomiasis Research, VOM, Jos, Plateau, Nigeria.
Abraham G DogoNational Veterinary Research Institute, VOM, Jos, Plateau, Nigeria.
Michael ThrusfieldRoyal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, UK.
Albert MugenyiDivision of Infection and Pathway Medicine, School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Elise VaumourinUnité d'Épidémiologie Animale, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Centre de recherche de, Clermont-Ferrand-Theix, France.
Augustine C IgwehNigerian Institute for Trypanosomiasis Research, VOM, Jos, Plateau, Nigeria.
Frans JongejanUtrecht Centre for Tick-borne Diseases, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Susan C WelburnDivision of Infection and Pathway Medicine, School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Kim PicozziDivision of Infection and Pathway Medicine, School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. kim.picozzi@ed.ac.uk.
Edinburgh College · GBNigerian Institute for Trypanosomiasis Research · NGUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUtrecht University · NLNational Veterinary Research Institute · NG

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H009213/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTicks and tick-borne diseases undermine cattle fitness and productivity in the whole of sub-Saharan Africa, including Nigeria. In this West African country, cattle are challenged by numerous tick species, especially during the wet season. Consequently, several TBDs are known to be endemic in Nigerian cattle, including anaplasmosis, babesiosis, cowdriosis and theilerioris (by Theileria mutans and Theileria velifera). To date, all investigations on cattle TBDs in Nigeria have been based on cytological examinations and/or on serological methods. This study aimed to ascertain the occurrence of tick-borne pathogens of veterinary and zoonotic importance in cattle in Nigeria using molecular approaches.

methodsIn October 2008, 704 whole blood samples were collected from indigenous cattle in the Plateau State, Nigeria. Analysis for tick-borne pathogens was conducted by means of PCR-based reverse line blotting (RLB) and sequencing targeting a panel of five genera of microorganisms (i.e. Babesia, Theileria, Anaplasma, Ehrlichia and Rickettsia spp.).

resultsIn total, 561/704 (82.6%) animals were found infected, with 465 (69.6%) of them being infected by two or more microorganisms, with up to 77 possible combinations of pathogens detected. Theileria mutans was the most prevalent microorganism (66.3%), followed by Theileria velifera (52.4%), Theileria taurotragi (39.5%), Anaplasma marginale (39.1%), Anaplasma sp. (Omatjenne) (34.7%), Babesia bigemina (7.9%), Anaplasma centrale (6.3%), Anaplasma platys (3.9%), Rickettsia massiliae (3.5%), Babesia bovis (2.0%) and Ehrlichia ruminantium (1.1%). Calves were found significantly less infected than juvenile and adult cattle.

conclusionsThis study provides updated, molecular-based information on cattle TBDs in Nigeria. The molecular approach employed allowed the diagnosis of numerous positive cases including carrier statuses, multiple infections and novel pathogen detections within the indigenous cattle population. Moreover, the RLB method here described enabled the detection of veterinary agents not only pertaining to bovine health, including also those of zoonotic importance. The high prevalence recorded for T. mutans, T. velifera, A. marginale, T. taurotragi and Anaplasma sp. (Omatjenne), suggests they may be endemically established in Nigeria, whereas the lower prevalence recorded for other microorganisms (i.e. A. centrale and B. bovis) highlights a less stable epidemiological scenario, requiring further investigations.

Indexed as

AnaplasmaAnimalsBabesiaCattleCattle DiseasesEhrlichiaNigeriaTheileriaTick-Borne DiseasesTicksZoonosesAfricaCattleFulaniNigeriaTick-borne diseasesTick-borne pathogensZoonoses

Identifiers

PMID27090756
PMCPMC4836144
OpenAlexW2337436131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.