Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27090600›Full record

ArticleSingapore medical journal2017

Quality of life of family caregivers of cancer patients in Singapore and globally.

Haikel A Lim, Joyce Ys Tan, Joanne Chua, Russell Kl Yoong, Siew Eng Lim, Ee Heok Kua, Rathi Mahendran

Open access · diamondAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Singapore medical journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Bangkok declarations on cancer control in Asia.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Exploring the lived experience of Chinese family caregivers caring for end-of-life cancer patients at home: a phenomenological study in Singapore.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Experiences of caring for women with cervical cancer: A qualitative study among male partners in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  17. Psychosocial symptoms associated with spiritual well-being in Latino patients and caregivers coping with advanced cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. A qualitative exploration of the dynamics of guilt experience in family cancer caregivers.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Haikel A LimDepartment of Psychological Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Joyce Ys TanDepartment of Psychological Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Joanne ChuaDepartment of Psychological Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore.
Russell Kl YoongDepartment of Psychological Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Siew Eng LimDepartment of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore.
Ee Heok KuaDepartment of Psychological Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Rathi MahendranDepartment of Psychological Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
National University of Singapore · SGDuke-NUS Medical School · SGNational University Hospital · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFamily caregivers of cancer patients often suffer from impaired quality of life (QOL) due to stress arising from the responsibility of caregiving. Most research on such QOL impairments was conducted in Western populations. Thus, this exploratory study sought to (a) examine the QOL levels of family caregivers of cancer patients in an Asian population in Singapore, in relation to caregivers from other countries within and outside of Asia; and (b) investigate the association between sociodemographic factors and QOL impairments in family caregivers in Singapore.

methodsA total of 258 family caregivers of cancer patients who were receiving outpatient treatment completed the Caregiver Quality of Life Index-Cancer (CQOLC) and a sociodemographic survey. We compared the published CQOLC total scores from Turkey, Iran, Taiwan, South Korea, the United Kingdom, the United States and Canada with the Singapore dataset and examined the demographic relationships.

resultsCaregivers in Singapore and Asia had lower CQOLC total scores than their Western counterparts. Caregivers who were male, of Chinese ethnicity, had parental relationships with their care recipient, or cared for advanced-stage cancer patients were found to have impaired QOL.

conclusionThe findings of this study highlight possible areas in which support can be provided for family caregivers of cancer patients, and underscore the need to reconcile cultural diversity, values, societal expectations and demographic characteristics in Singapore.

Indexed as

Family HealthAdolescentAdultAgedCanadaCaregiversCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGlobal HealthHumansIranMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsQuality of LifeRepublic of Koreacancer patientsfamily caregiversquality of life

Identifiers

PMID27090600
PMCPMC5435844
OpenAlexW2340914121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.