Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27090434›Full record

SynthesisPreventive medicine2016

A systematic review of interventions to improve adherence to melanoma preventive behaviors for individuals at elevated risk.

Yelena P Wu, Lisa G Aspinwall, Bridgid M Conn, Tammy Stump, Bridget Grahmann, Sancy A Leachman

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Preventive medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yelena P WuDivision of Public Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah, USA; Huntsman Cancer Institute, USA. Electronic address: yelena.wu@utah.edu.
Lisa G AspinwallHuntsman Cancer Institute, USA; Department of Psychology, University of Utah, USA.
Bridgid M ConnDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, USA.
Tammy StumpDepartment of Psychology, University of Utah, USA.
Bridget GrahmannDivision of Public Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah, USA.
Sancy A LeachmanHuntsman Cancer Institute, USA; Department of Dermatology, Oregon Health & Science University, USA.
University of Utah · USChildren's Hospital of Los Angeles · USHuntsman Cancer Institute · USOregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

Impact of Melanoma Genetic Testing on Health Cognitions and Prevention BehaviorsR01CA158322 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI ASPINWALL, LISA G, LEACHMAN, SANCY ANN · 2011 to 2016
$2.5M
Translational Approaches to Melanoma Prevention in Children at High Genetic RiskK07CA196985 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI WU, YELENA PING · 2015 to 2019
$682k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA196985NCI NIH HHS R01 CA158322
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesTo examine the effectiveness of behavioral interventions for melanoma prevention targeted to individuals at elevated risk due to personal and/or family history.

methodsThrough literature searches in 5 search databases (through July 2014), 20 articles describing 14 unique interventions focused on melanoma prevention among individuals at elevated risk for the disease were identified. Interventions targeting only patients undergoing active treatment for melanoma were excluded.

resultsThe average study quality was moderate. The majority of interventions (6 out of 9, 66% of studies) led to improvements in one or more photoprotective behaviors, particularly for improvements in use of protective clothing (3 out of 5, 60% of studies), and frequency and/or thoroughness of skin self-examinations (9 out of 12, 75%). Fewer interventions (5 out of 14, 36%) targeted uptake of total body skin examinations (60% led to improvements). Also, fewer interventions targeted all three preventive behaviors (5 out of 14, 36%).

conclusionsFindings suggest that future interventions should aim to improve adherence across multiple preventive behaviors, over a longer time period (past 8months post-intervention), and target high-risk children. Studies should include adequate sample sizes to investigate moderators and mediators of intervention effectiveness. Interventions may be strengthened by new techniques, such as incorporating family members (e.g., to improve thoroughness of skin self-examinations) and eHealth technology.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorHumansMelanomaProtective ClothingRisk FactorsSelf-ExaminationHigh-riskInterventionMelanomaPreventionReview

Identifiers

PMID27090434
PMCPMC4902721
OpenAlexW2339131461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.