Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27090175›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2016

Effect of Fidaxomicin versus Vancomycin on Susceptibility to Intestinal Colonization with Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci and Klebsiella pneumoniae in Mice.

Abhishek Deshpande, Kelly Hurless, Jennifer L Cadnum, Laurent Chesnel, Lihong Gao, Luisa Chan, Sirisha Kundrapu, Alexander Polinkovsky, Curtis J Donskey

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Navigating recurrentAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2025
    Article
  4. Deciphering the gastrointestinal carriage ofInfection and immunity · 2024
    Review
  5. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Fidaxomicin for the Treatment ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  8. Which is the Preferred Regimen for Non-SevereInfection & chemotherapy · 2022
    Review
  9. FromMicroorganisms · 2021
    Review
  10. Human Microbiome and Its Medical Applications.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. [Recommendations from a panel of experts on the usefulness of fidaxomicin for the treatment of infections caused by Clostridium difficile].Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2019
    Article
  16. A comprehensive approach for the patient with Clostridium difficile infection.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2018
    Review
  17. Update in Infectious Diseases 2018.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Abhishek DeshpandeDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA Department of Infectious Diseases, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Kelly HurlessDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Jennifer L CadnumDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Laurent ChesnelMerck and Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.
Lihong GaoMerck and Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.
Luisa ChanSecond Genome, Inc., San Bruno, California, USA.
Sirisha KundrapuDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Alexander PolinkovskyDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Curtis J DonskeyDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA curtisd123@yahoo.com.
Case Western Reserve University · USMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · USUniversity School · USLouis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center · USSecond Genome (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of oral vancomycin or metronidazole for treatment of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) may promote colonization by health care-associated pathogens due to disruption of the intestinal microbiota. Because the macrocyclic antibiotic fidaxomicin causes less alteration of the intestinal microbiota than vancomycin, we hypothesized that it would not lead to a loss of colonization resistance to vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and extended-spectrum-β-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (ESBL-Kp). Mice (8 per group) received orogastric saline, vancomycin, or fidaxomicin daily for 5 days at doses resulting in stool concentrations in mice similar to those measured in humans. The mice were challenged with 10(5) CFU of orogastric VRE or ESBL-Kp on day 2 of treatment and concentrations of the pathogens in stool were monitored. The impact of drug exposure on the microbiome was measured by cultures, real-time PCR for selected anaerobic bacteria, and deep sequencing. In comparison to saline controls, oral vancomycin promoted establishment of high-density colonization by VRE and ESBL-Kp in stool (8 to 10 log10 CFU/g; P < 0.001), whereas fidaxomicin did not (<4 log10 CFU; P > 0.5). Vancomycin treatment resulted in significant reductions in enterococci, Bacteroides spp., and Clostridium leptum, whereas the population of aerobic and facultative Gram-negative bacilli increased; deep-sequencing analysis demonstrated suppression of Firmicutes and expansion of Proteobacteria during vancomycin treatment. Fidaxomicin did not cause significant alteration of the microbiota. In summary, in contrast to vancomycin, fidaxomicin treatment caused minimal disruption of the intestinal microbiota and did not render the microbiota susceptible to VRE and ESBL-Kp colonization.

Indexed as

AminoglycosidesAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacillotaBacteroides Infectionsbeta-LactamasesClostridiumFecesFemaleFidaxomicinIntestinesKlebsiella pneumoniaeMiceMicrobial Sensitivity TestsReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionVancomycinAminoglycosidesAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesFidaxomicinVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID27090175
PMCPMC4914684
OpenAlexW2339519864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.