ReviewScience and engineering ethics2017
Definitions and Conceptual Dimensions of Responsible Research and Innovation: A Literature Review.
Review in Science and engineering ethics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Which Framework to Use? A Systematic Review of Ethical Frameworks for the Screening or Evaluation of Health Technology Innovations.Science and engineering ethics · 2022Pooled it
- Practices of Responsible Research and Innovation: A Review.Science and engineering ethics · 2020Pooled it
- Methods for Practising Ethics in Research and Innovation: A Literature Review, Critical Analysis and Recommendations.Science and engineering ethics · 2018Pooled it
- When Novelty Outpaces Evidence: Social Media as an Unregulated Force Propelling Innovation in Endodontics: A Narrative Review.International endodontic journal · 2026Review
- The ethics of artificial intelligence systems in healthcare and medicine: from a local to a global perspective, and back.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2025Review
- From ownership to custodianship: rethinking human biospecimens data governance in the Chinese context.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- Political philosophy of experimentation.European journal for philosophy of science · 2025Article
- Stakeholder engagement in European research and innovation: An investigation into how and why EU R&I projects develop engagement tools.Open research Europe · 2025Article
- Explaining key stakeholders' preferences for potential policies governing psychiatric electroceutical intervention use.Npj mental health research · 2024Article
- How to embed ethics into laboratory research.Accountability in research · 2024Article
- The Ethics of Stem Cell-Based Embryo-Like Structures : A Focus Group Study on the Perspectives of Dutch Professionals and Lay Citizens.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2024Article
- The Conceptualization and Measurement of Research Impact in Primary Health Care: Protocol for a Rapid Scoping Review.JMIR research protocols · 2024Article
- New genomic techniques, old divides: Stakeholder attitudes towards new biotechnology regulation in the EU and UK.PloS one · 2024Article
- Responsible Design Thinking for Sustainable Development: Critical Literature Review, New Conceptual Framework, and Research Agenda.Journal of business ethics : JBE · 2024Review
- Exploring the dimensions of responsible research systems and cultures: a scoping review.Royal Society open science · 2024Article
- What's next for responsible artificial intelligence: a way forward through responsible innovation.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Responsibly shaping technology innovation for the energy transition: an RRI indicator system as a tool.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2023Article
- Electronic Tracking Devices for People With Dementia: Content Analysis of Company Websites.JMIR aging · 2022Article
- Implementing ethical aspects in the development of a robotic system for nursing care: a qualitative approach.BMC nursing · 2022Article
- The Societal Readiness Thinking Tool: A Practical Resource for Maturing the Societal Readiness of Research Projects.Science and engineering ethics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study is to provide a discussion on the definitions and conceptual dimensions of Responsible Research and Innovation based on findings from the literature. In the study, the outcomes of a literature review of 235 RRI-related articles were presented. The articles were selected from the EBSCO and Google Scholar databases regarding the definitions and dimensions of RRI. The results of the study indicated that while administrative definitions were widely quoted in the reviewed literature, they were not substantially further elaborated. Academic definitions were mostly derived from the institutional definitions; however, more empirical studies should be conducted in order to give a broader empirical basis to the development of the concept. In the current study, four distinct conceptual dimensions of RRI that appeared in the reviewed literature were brought out: inclusion, anticipation, responsiveness and reflexivity. Two emerging conceptual dimensions were also added: sustainability and care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27090147What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.