Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27090084›Full record

ArticleeLife2016

Evolution of the head-trunk interface in tetrapod vertebrates.

Elizabeth M Sefton, Bhart-Anjan S Bhullar, Zahra Mohaddes, James Hanken

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Reappraisal of the Silurian placodermRoyal Society open science · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Muscle development in the sharkFrontiers in zoology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elizabeth M SeftonDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6481-612X
Bhart-Anjan S BhullarDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0838-8068
Zahra MohaddesDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3766-5896
James HankenDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2782-9671

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vertebrate neck musculature spans the transition zone between head and trunk. The extent to which the cucullaris muscle is a cranial muscle allied with the gill levators of anamniotes or is instead a trunk muscle is an ongoing debate. Novel computed tomography datasets reveal broad conservation of the cucullaris in gnathostomes, including coelacanth and caecilian, two sarcopterygians previously thought to lack it. In chicken, lateral plate mesoderm (LPM) adjacent to occipital somites is a recently identified embryonic source of cervical musculature. We fate-map this mesoderm in the axolotl (Ambystoma mexicanum), which retains external gills, and demonstrate its contribution to posterior gill-levator muscles and the cucullaris. Accordingly, LPM adjacent to the occipital somites should be regarded as posterior cranial mesoderm. The axial position of the head-trunk border in axolotl is congruent between LPM and somitic mesoderm, unlike in chicken and possibly other amniotes.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAnimalsHeadMuscle, SkeletalNeckThoraxVertebratesAxolotlCaecilianCoelacanthdevelopmental biologyevolutionary biologyfate mappinggenomicsmuscle developmentneck evolutionstem cells

Identifiers

PMID27090084
PMCPMC4841772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.