Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27090081›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2016

Accessing and engaging women from socio-economically disadvantaged areas: a participatory approach to the design of a public health intervention for delivery in a Bingo club.

Josie M M Evans, Gemma Ryde, Ruth Jepson, Cindy Gray, Ashley Shepherd, Dionne Mackison, Aileen V Ireland, Marion E T McMurdo, Brian Williams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Josie M M EvansSchool of Health Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, Scotland, UK. josie.evans@stir.ac.uk.
Gemma RydeSchool of Health Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, Scotland, UK.
Ruth JepsonScottish Collaboration for Public Health Research and Policy, 20 West Richmond St, EH8 9DX, Edinburgh, UK.
Cindy GrayInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, College of Social Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8RS, UK.
Ashley ShepherdSchool of Health Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, Scotland, UK.
Dionne MackisonNHS Health Scotland, Edinburgh, UK.
Aileen V IrelandSchool of Health Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, Scotland, UK.
Marion E T McMurdoMedical Research Institute, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK.
Brian WilliamsSchool of Health Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, Scotland, UK.

Funding

Chief Scientist Office CZH/4/781Medical Research Council MR/K023209/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOur aim was to use participatory methods to investigate the feasibility and acceptability of using Bingo clubs for the design and delivery of an evidence-based physical activity and/or healthy eating intervention to socio-economically disadvantaged women. This paper describes the participatory process that has resulted in a physical activity intervention for women aged >55 years, ready for pilot-testing in a Bingo club setting.

methodsStudies using different quantitative and qualitative approaches were conducted among customers and staff of a Bingo club in a city of 85,000 inhabitants in central Scotland. These were designed to take the views of different stakeholders into account, with a view to enhancing uptake, engagement and effectiveness with any proposed intervention.

resultsSixteen relevant studies were identified in a literature review that generated ideas for intervention components. A questionnaire completed by 151 women in the Bingo club showed that almost half (47 %) aged >55 years were not meeting physical activity guidelines; evidence backed up by accelerometer data from 29 women. Discussions in six focus groups attended by 27 club members revealed different but overlapping motivations for attending the Bingo club (social benefits) and playing Bingo (cognitive benefits). There was some scepticism as to whether the Bingo club was an appropriate setting for an intervention, and a dietary intervention was not favoured. It was clear that any planned intervention needed to utilise the social motivation and habitual nature of attendance at the Bingo club, without taking women away from Bingo games. These results were taken forward to a 5-h long participative workshop with 27 stakeholders (including 19 Bingo players). Intervention design (form and content) was then finalised during two round table research team meetings.

conclusionsIt was possible to access and engage with women living in areas of socio-economic disadvantage through a Bingo club setting. A physical activity intervention for women >55 years is realistic for recruitment, will address the needs of potential recipients in the Bingo club, appears to be feasible and acceptable to club members and staff, and has been designed with their input. A pilot study is underway, investigating recruitment, retention and feasibility of delivery.

Indexed as

Games, RecreationalPoverty AreasAdultAgedDelivery of Health CareExerciseFeasibility StudiesFemaleFocus GroupsGuidelines as TopicHumansMiddle AgedMotivationPublic HealthQualitative ResearchScotlandInterventionNovel settingParticipative approachPhysical activity

Identifiers

PMID27090081
PMCPMC4836085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.