Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27089883›Full record

ArticleBrain structure & function2017

Forward masking in the superior paraolivary nucleus of the rat.

Fei Gao, Alexandra Kadner, Richard A Felix, Liang Chen, Albert S Berrebi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain structure & function, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fei GaoDepartments of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Neurobiology and Anatomy and the Sensory Neuroscience Research Center, West Virginia University Health Sciences Center, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA.
Alexandra KadnerDepartments of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Neurobiology and Anatomy and the Sensory Neuroscience Research Center, West Virginia University Health Sciences Center, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA.
Richard A FelixSchool of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Vancouver, WA, USA.
Liang ChenDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Russ College of Engineering and Technology, Ohio University, Athens, OH, 45701, USA.
Albert S BerrebiDepartments of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Neurobiology and Anatomy and the Sensory Neuroscience Research Center, West Virginia University Health Sciences Center, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA. aberrebi@hsc.wvu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1506-9081

Funding

NEURONS AND CIRCUITS OF PERIOLIVARY NUCLEIR01DC002266 · NIDCD · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI BERREBI, ALBERT S · 2002 to 2013
$2.8M
Research Training Program in the Behavioral and Biomedical SciencesT32GM081741 · NIGMS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI BERREBI, ALBERT S, SIMPKINS, JAMES W. · 2008 to 2018
$2.1M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC002266NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM081741
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In natural acoustic environments, perception of acoustic stimuli depends on the recent contextual history. Forward masking describes a phenomenon whereby the detection threshold of a probe stimulus is markedly increased when it is preceded by a masking stimulus. The aim of this study was to characterize the offset response of single units in the superior paraolivary nucleus (SPON) to a forward masking paradigm. We observed two distinct response types to forward-masked stimuli, namely inhibited and facilitated responses. In the presence of a default masking stimulus, inhibited responses to probe stimuli were characterized by elevated thresholds and/or diminished spike counts, whereas facilitated responses were characterized by reduced thresholds and increased spike counts. In units with inhibited responses to the probe stimuli, probe thresholds increased and spike counts decreased as masker intensity was raised or the masker-to-probe delay was shortened. Conversely, in units with facilitated responses to the probe stimuli, probe thresholds decreased and spike counts increased as masker intensity was raised or the masker-to-probe delay was shortened. Neither inhibited nor facilitated responses to the forward masking paradigm were significantly dependent on masker frequency. These findings suggest that SPON responses are not themselves consistently subject to the same forward masking properties observed in other nuclei along the ascending auditory pathway. The potential neural mechanisms of the forward masking responses observed in the SPON are discussed.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAction PotentialsAnimalsFemaleNeuronsPerceptual MaskingRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySuperior Olivary ComplexAuditory scene analysisContext dependenceForward facilitationForward suppressionSPON

Identifiers

PMID27089883
PMCPMC5069114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.