Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27089364›Full record

ArticleToxins2016

Review Over a 3-Year Period of European Union Proficiency Tests for Detection of Staphylococcal Enterotoxins in Food Matrices.

Yacine Nia, Isabelle Mutel, Adrien Assere, Bertrand Lombard, Frederic Auvray, Jacques-Antoine Hennekinne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxins, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yacine NiaLaboratory for food safety, ANSES, Université Paris-Est, F-94700 Maisons-Alfort, France. yacine.nia@anses.fr.
Isabelle MutelLaboratory for food safety, ANSES, Université Paris-Est, F-94700 Maisons-Alfort, France. isabelle.mutel@anses.fr.
Adrien AssereLaboratory for food safety, ANSES, Université Paris-Est, F-94700 Maisons-Alfort, France. adrien.assere@anses.fr.
Bertrand LombardLaboratory for food safety, ANSES, Université Paris-Est, F-94700 Maisons-Alfort, France. bertrand.lombard@anses.fr.
Frederic AuvrayLaboratory for food safety, ANSES, Université Paris-Est, F-94700 Maisons-Alfort, France. frederic.auvray@anses.fr.
Jacques-Antoine HennekinneLaboratory for food safety, ANSES, Université Paris-Est, F-94700 Maisons-Alfort, France. jacques-antoine.hennekinne@anses.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Staphylococcal food poisoning outbreaks are a major cause of foodborne illnesses in Europe and their notifications have been mandatory since 2005. Even though the European regulation on microbiological criteria for food defines a criterion on staphylococcal enterotoxin (SE) only in cheese and dairy products, European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) data reported that various types of food matrices are involved in staphylococcal food poisoning outbreaks. The European Screening Method (ESM) of European Union Reference Laboratory for Coagulase Positive Staphylococci (EURL CPS) was validated in 2011 for SE detection in food matrices and is currently the official method used for screening purposes in Europe. In this context, EURLCPS is annually organizing Inter-Laboratory Proficiency Testing Trials (ILPT) to evaluate the competency of the European countries' National Reference Laboratories (NRLs) to analyse SE content in food matrices. A total of 31 NRLs representing 93% of European countries participated in these ILPTs. Eight food matrices were used for ILPT over the period 2013-2015, including cheese, freeze-dried cheese, tuna, mackerel, roasted chicken, ready-to-eat food, milk, and pastry. Food samples were spiked with four SE types (i.e., SEA, SEC, SED, and SEE) at various concentrations. Homogeneity and stability studies showed that ILPT samples were both homogeneous and stable. The analysis of results obtained by participants for a total of 155 blank and 620 contaminated samples allowed for evaluation of trueness (>98%) and specificity (100%) of ESM. Further to the validation study of ESM carried out in 2011, these three ILPTs allowed for the assessment of the proficiency of the NRL network and the performance of ESM on a large variety of food matrices and samples. The ILPT design presented here will be helpful for the organization of ILPT on SE detection by NRLs or other expert laboratories.

Indexed as

Laboratory Proficiency TestingStaphylococcusAnimalsCheeseEnterotoxinsEuropean UnionFood ContaminationMilkPerciformesPoultryReproducibility of ResultsSeafoodStaphylococcal Food PoisoningTunaEnterotoxinsEuropean Screening MethodInter-Laboratory Proficiency Testing Trialsstaphylococcal enterotoxins

Identifiers

PMID27089364
PMCPMC4848633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.