Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27089312›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2016

Adapting Document Similarity Measures for Ligand-Based Virtual Screening.

Mubarak Himmat, Naomie Salim, Mohammed Mumtaz Al-Dabbagh, Faisal Saeed, Ali Ahmed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Virtual screening: hope, hype, and the fine line in between.Expert opinion on drug discovery · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Quantum probability ranking principle for ligand-based virtual screening.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mubarak HimmatFaculty of Computing, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Johor 81310, Malaysia. barakamub@yahoo.com.
Naomie SalimFaculty of Computing, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Johor 81310, Malaysia. naomie@utm.my.
Mohammed Mumtaz Al-DabbaghFaculty of Computing, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Johor 81310, Malaysia. mohamad.aldabbagh@protonmail.com.
Faisal SaeedFaculty of Computing, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Johor 81310, Malaysia. faisalsaeed@utm.my.
Ali AhmedFaculty of Computing, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Johor 81310, Malaysia. alikarary@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantifying the similarity of molecules is considered one of the major tasks in virtual screening. There are many similarity measures that have been proposed for this purpose, some of which have been derived from document and text retrieving areas as most often these similarity methods give good results in document retrieval and can achieve good results in virtual screening. In this work, we propose a similarity measure for ligand-based virtual screening, which has been derived from a text processing similarity measure. It has been adopted to be suitable for virtual screening; we called this proposed measure the Adapted Similarity Measure of Text Processing (ASMTP). For evaluating and testing the proposed ASMTP we conducted several experiments on two different benchmark datasets: the Maximum Unbiased Validation (MUV) and the MDL Drug Data Report (MDDR). The experiments have been conducted by choosing 10 reference structures from each class randomly as queries and evaluate them in the recall of cut-offs at 1% and 5%. The overall obtained results are compared with some similarity methods including the Tanimoto coefficient, which are considered to be the conventional and standard similarity coefficients for fingerprint-based similarity calculations. The achieved results show that the performance of ligand-based virtual screening is better and outperforms the Tanimoto coefficients and other methods.

Indexed as

Data MiningDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalAlgorithmsComputer SimulationHumansLigandsMolecular StructureUser-Computer InterfaceLigandschemoinformaticsdrug discoverysimilarity coefficientssimilarly searchvirtual screening

Identifiers

PMID27089312
PMCPMC6274479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.