Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27089159›Full record

Trial reportBehaviour research and therapy2016

Improving outcome for mental disorders by enhancing memory for treatment.

Allison G Harvey, Jason Lee, Rita L Smith, Nicole B Gumport, Steven D Hollon, Sophia Rabe-Hesketh, Kerrie Hein, Emily A Dolsen, Kirsten L Haman, Jennifer C Kanady and 2 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Behaviour research and therapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Patient learning of treatment contents in cognitive therapy.Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry · 2018
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Do improved patient recall and the provision of memory support enhance treatment adherence?Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry · 2017
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Transdiagnostic Sleep and Circadian Intervention for Adolescents Plus Text Messaging: Randomized Controlled Trial 12-month Follow-up.Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53
    Trial
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Development and preliminary validation of the treatment adherence rating scale.Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Allison G HarveyUniversity of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. Electronic address: aharvey@berkeley.edu.
Jason LeeUniversity of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Rita L SmithUniversity of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Nicole B GumportUniversity of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Steven D HollonVanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Sophia Rabe-HeskethUniversity of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Kerrie HeinUniversity of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Emily A DolsenUniversity of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Kirsten L HamanVanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Jennifer C KanadyUniversity of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Monique A ThompsonUniversity of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Deidre AbronsUniversity of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.

Funding

PREDOCTORAL TRAINING CONSORTIUM IN AFFECTIVE SCIENCET32MH020006 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI GROSS, JAMES J, JOHNSON, SHERI L · 1998 to 2018
$5.9M
Improving Depression Outcome by Enhancing Memory for Cognitive TherapyR01MH108657 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI HARVEY, ALLISON G · 2016 to 2019
$3.0M
Improving Depression Outcome by Enhancing Memory for Cognitive TherapyR34MH094535 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI HARVEY, ALLISON G · 2012 to 2014
$813k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH108657NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH094535NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH020006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients exhibit poor memory for treatment. A novel Memory Support Intervention, derived from basic science in cognitive psychology and education, is tested with the goal of improving patient memory for treatment and treatment outcome. Adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) were randomized to 14 sessions of cognitive therapy (CT)+Memory Support (n = 25) or CT-as-usual (n = 23). Outcomes were assessed at baseline, post-treatment and 6 months later. Memory support was greater in CT+Memory Support compared to the CT-as-usual. Compared to CT-as-usual, small to medium effect sizes were observed for recall of treatment points at post-treatment. There was no difference between the treatment arms on depression severity (primary outcome). However, the odds of meeting criteria for 'response' and 'remission' were higher in CT+Memory Support compared with CT-as-usual. CT+Memory Support also showed an advantage on functional impairment. While some decline was observed, the advantage of CT+Memory Support was evident through 6-month follow-up. Patients with less than 16 years of education experience greater benefits from memory support than those with 16 or more years of education. Memory support can be manipulated, may improve patient memory for treatment and may be associated with an improved outcome.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyLearningAdultFemaleHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultCognitive therapyDepressionMemoryTransdiagnostic

Identifiers

PMID27089159
PMCPMC5559714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.