Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27089040›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Comparison of Methods to Identify Pathogens and Associated Virulence Functional Genes in Biosolids from Two Different Wastewater Treatment Facilities in Canada.

Etienne Yergeau, Luke Masson, Miria Elias, Shurong Xiang, Ewa Madey, Hongsheng Huang, Brian Brooks, Lee A Beaudette

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Etienne YergeauNational Research Council Canada, Energy Mining and Environment, Montreal, Qc, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7112-3425
Luke MassonNational Research Council Canada, Human Health Therapeutics, Montreal, Qc, Canada.
Miria EliasNational Research Council Canada, Energy Mining and Environment, Montreal, Qc, Canada.
Shurong XiangEnvironment Canada, Biological Assessment and Standardization Section, Ottawa, On, Canada.
Ewa MadeyCanadian Food Inspection Agency, Fertilizer Safety Office, Plant Health & Biosecurity Directorate, Ottawa, On, Canada.
Hongsheng HuangCanadian Food Inspection Agency, Ottawa Laboratory - Fallowfield, Ottawa, On, Canada.
Brian BrooksCanadian Food Inspection Agency, Ottawa Laboratory - Fallowfield, Ottawa, On, Canada.
Lee A BeaudetteEnvironment Canada, Biological Assessment and Standardization Section, Ottawa, On, Canada.
Canadian Food Inspection Agency · CANational Research Council Canada · CAEnvironment and Climate Change Canada · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of treated municipal wastewater residues (biosolids) as fertilizers is an attractive, inexpensive option for growers and farmers. Various regulatory bodies typically employ indicator organisms (fecal coliforms, E. coli and Salmonella) to assess the adequacy and efficiency of the wastewater treatment process in reducing pathogen loads in the final product. Molecular detection approaches can offer some advantages over culture-based methods as they can simultaneously detect a wider microbial species range, including non-cultivable microorganisms. However, they cannot directly assess the viability of the pathogens. Here, we used bacterial enumeration methods together with molecular methods including qPCR, 16S rRNA and cpn60 gene amplicon sequencing and shotgun metagenomic sequencing to compare pre- and post-treatment biosolids from two Canadian wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). Our results show that an anaerobic digestion WWTP was unsuccessful at reducing the live indicator organism load (coliforms, generic E. coli and Salmonella) below acceptable regulatory criteria, while biosolids from a dewatering/pelletization WWTP met these criteria. DNA from other pathogens was detected by the molecular methods, but these species were considered less abundant. Clostridium DNA increased significantly following anaerobic digestion treatments. In addition to pathogen DNA, genes related to virulence and antibiotic resistance were identified in treated biosolids. Shotgun metagenomics revealed the widest range of pathogen DNA and, among the approaches used here, was the only approach that could access functional gene information in treated biosolids. Overall, our results highlight the potential usefulness of amplicon sequencing and shotgun metagenomics as complementary screening methods that could be used in parallel with culture-based methods, although more detailed comparisons across a wider range of sites would be needed.

Indexed as

CanadaEnvironmental MonitoringEscherichia coliFecesGenes, BacterialMetagenomicsPolymerase Chain ReactionReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSalmonellaSewageVirulenceWaste ManagementWastewaterWater PollutantsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSewageWastewaterWater Pollutants

Identifiers

PMID27089040
PMCPMC4835084
OpenAlexW2340903459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.