Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27088104›Full record

ReviewMolecular therapy. Methods & clinical development2016

Moving oncolytic viruses into the clinic: clinical-grade production, purification, and characterization of diverse oncolytic viruses.

Guy Ungerechts, Sascha Bossow, Barbara Leuchs, Per S Holm, Jean Rommelaere, Matt Coffey, Rob Coffin, John Bell, Dirk M Nettelbeck

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Oncolytic viruses: advanced strategies in cancer therapy.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Genetically modified ZIKA virus as a microRNA-sensitive oncolytic virus against central nervous system tumors.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Optimal delivery of RNA interference by viral vectors for cancer therapy.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2023
    Review
  16. Study of Oncolytic Virus Preservation and Formulation.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Guy UngerechtsCentre for Innovative Cancer Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Department of Translational Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases and University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sascha BossowCentre for Innovative Cancer Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute , Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Barbara LeuchsDepartment of Tumor Virology, Infection, Inflammation and Cancer program, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) , Heidelberg, Germany.
Per S HolmDepartment of Urology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich , Munich, Germany.
Jean RommelaereDepartment of Tumor Virology, Infection, Inflammation and Cancer program, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) , Heidelberg, Germany.
Matt CoffeyOncolytics Biotech Inc. , Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Rob CoffinReplimune Ltd , Oxford, UK.
John BellCentre for Innovative Cancer Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute , Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Dirk M NettelbeckGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) , Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oncolytic viruses (OVs) are unique anticancer agents based on their pleotropic modes of action, which include, besides viral tumor cell lysis, activation of antitumor immunity. A panel of diverse viruses, often genetically engineered, has advanced to clinical investigation, including phase 3 studies. This diversity of virotherapeutics not only offers interesting opportunities for the implementation of different therapeutic regimens but also poses challenges for clinical translation. Thus, manufacturing processes and regulatory approval paths need to be established for each OV individually. This review provides an overview of clinical-grade manufacturing procedures for OVs using six virus families as examples, and key challenges are discussed individually. For example, different virus features with respect to particle size, presence/absence of an envelope, and host species imply specific requirements for measures to ensure sterility, for handling, and for determination of appropriate animal models for toxicity testing, respectively. On the other hand, optimization of serum-free culture conditions, increasing virus yields, development of scalable purification strategies, and formulations guaranteeing long-term stability are challenges common to several if not all OVs. In light of the recent marketing approval of the first OV in the Western world, strategies for further upscaling OV manufacturing and optimizing product characterization will receive increasing attention.

Identifiers

PMID27088104
PMCPMC4822647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.