Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27088009›Full record

ReviewJournal of ophthalmology2016

Comprehensive Review of the Literature on Existing Punctal Plugs for the Management of Dry Eye Disease.

Naz Jehangir, Greg Bever, S M Jafar Mahmood, Majid Moshirfar

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of ophthalmology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03396809 (The Use of Punctal Plugs in Reducing Iodine Related Ocular Surface Discomfort), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03396809 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

The Use of Punctal Plugs in Reducing Iodine Related Ocular Surface Discomfort

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of New MexicoRan2017 to 2018Enrolled0ConditionsDry Eye SyndromesArmsPunctal plug
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Punctal occlusion for dry eye syndrome.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Quintessence of currently approved and upcoming treatments for dry eye disease.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Review
  10. Drug Delivery Systems for Glaucoma: A Narrative Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Naz JehangirFrancis I. Proctor Foundation, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Greg BeverDepartment of Ophthalmology, Francis I. Proctor Foundation, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
S M Jafar MahmoodCharles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA.
Majid MoshirfarDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA.
Florida Atlantic University · USSan Francisco Foundation · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous designs of punctal and canalicular plugs are available on the market. This variety presents challenges to ophthalmologists when choosing punctal plugs for the management of various ocular conditions. The aim of this literature review is to provide a classification system for lacrimal occlusive devices based on their location and duration of action as well as to identify different characteristics of each one of them. We want to give a comprehensive overview on punctal and canalicular plugs including their manufacturing companies, indications, and complications that have been reported in various articles. PubMed and Google Scholar were used to identify articles written in English as well as few articles written in Japanese, Chinese, Slovak, and Spanish that had abstracts in English. Nine different companies that manufacture punctal and canalicular plugs were identified and their plugs were included in this review. Punctal and canalicular plugs are used in the management of various ocular conditions including dry eye disease and punctal stenosis as well as in ocular drug delivery. Although they are a relatively safe option, associated complications have been reported in the literature such as infection, allergic reaction, extrusion, and migration.

Identifiers

PMID27088009
PMCPMC4800096
OpenAlexW2299003994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.