ArticleJournal of ophthalmology2016
Microperimetric Assessment after Epiretinal Membrane Surgery: 4-Year Follow-Up.
Article in Journal of ophthalmology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 220 citations in OpenAlex.
- With or without internal limiting membrane peeling during idiopathic epiretinal membrane surgery: A meta-analysis.PloS one · 2021Pooled it
- Vitrectomy with or without internal limiting membrane peeling for idiopathic epiretinal membrane: A meta-analysis.PloS one · 2017Pooled it
- Functional and structural outcomes of ILM peeling in uncomplicated macula-off RRD using microperimetry & en-face OCT.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2018Trial
- Preoperative OCT Biomarkers as Predictors of Postoperative Functional Outcome Assessed by Microperimetry After Inverted ILM Flap Surgery.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Evaluation by M-charts and Microperimeter-MP3 after broad internal limiting membrane peeling for idiopathic epiretinal membrane.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Observational
- Visual Function in Patients With Idiopathic Epiretinal Membrane Surgery: Evaluated by Microperimetry.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- Assessment of ganglion cell complex thickness and its correlation with retinal sensitivity using microperimetry 6 months after epiretinal membrane surgery.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2024Article
- Role of Vitreous Detachment in Epiretinal Membrane Peeling: A Multimodal Imaging and Microperimetry Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Correlation between retinal sensitivity assessed by microperimetry and structural abnormalities on optical coherence tomography after successful epiretinal membrane surgery.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2024Article
- Multimodal Assessment of the Prognostic Role of Ectopic Inner Foveal Layers on Epiretinal Membrane Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Microperimetric evaluation for different methods of epiretinal membrane surgery.BMC ophthalmology · 2023Article
- A Comparison Among Microperimetry, Standard Automated Perimetry and Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography in the Evaluation of the Macula in Glaucoma Eyes with Hemifield Defects.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2022Article
- Clinical Perspectives and Trends: Microperimetry as a Trial Endpoint in Retinal Disease.Ophthalmologica. Journal international d'ophtalmologie. International journal of ophthalmology. Zeitschrift fur Augenheilkunde · 2021Review
- MP-3 measurement of retinal sensitivity in macular hole area and its predictive value on visual prognosis.International ophthalmology · 2019Article
- Circumpapillary microperimetry to detect glaucoma: a pilot study for sector-based comparison to circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer measurement.International ophthalmology · 2019Article
- Idiopathic epiretinal membrane surgery: safety, efficacy and patient related outcomes.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2019Article
- Inverted internal limiting membrane-flap technique for large macular hole: a microperimetric study.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2019Article
- Test-Retest Reproducibility of the Microperimeter MP3 With Fundus Image Tracking in Healthy Subjects and Patients With Macular Disease.Translational vision science & technology · 2018Article
- Circumpapillary structure-function relationships with microperimetry and spectral domain optical coherence tomography in glaucoma: a pilot study.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2018Article
- Microperimetry - A New Tool for Assessing Retinal Sensitivity in Macular Diseases.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose. To investigate retinal function using microperimetry in patients affected by idiopathic epiretinal membrane (iERM) and cataract who underwent combined surgery: 4-year follow-up. Design. Prospective, interventional case series. Methods. 30 eyes of 30 consecutive patients with iERM and age-related cataract underwent 25-gauge vitrectomy and cataract surgery. At baseline, 90 and 180 days, and 1 and 4 years, we examined retinal mean sensitivity (MS), retinal mean defect (MD), fixation stability, and frequency of microscotomas using MP1 microperimetry. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) using a spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) were also performed. Results. All patients completed 1-year follow-up, while 23 patients reached last follow-up. Baseline MS and MD (10.48 ± 4.17 and -9.18 ± 4.40 dB) significantly changed at one year (12.33 ± 3.66 and -7.49 ± 3.31 dB, p < 0.01), at four years (14.18 ± 3.46 and -4.66 ± 2.85, p < 0.01), and between one and four years (p < 0.01) after surgery. Compared to baseline, CRT and BCVA significantly changed at one year and remained stable at four years. No variations were observed in fixation stability and frequency of microscotomas compared to baseline. Conclusions. Long-term follow-up using microperimetry seems useful to evaluate patients after iERM surgery: retinal sensitivity changes even when BCVA and CRT remain stable.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.