Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27087974›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical radiation sciences2016

Evaluation of accuracy and reproducibility of a relocatable maxillary fixation system for fractionated intracranial stereotactic radiation therapy.

Majella Russo, Rebecca Owen, Anne Bernard, Vaughan Moutrie, Matthew Foote

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical radiation sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Positioning error analysis of the fraxion localization system in the intracranial stereotactic radiotherapy of tumors.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Majella RussoDepartment of Radiation Oncology Princess Alexandra Hospital Brisbane Queensland Australia.
Rebecca OwenRadiation Oncology Mater Centre Princess Alexandra Hospital South Brisbane Queensland Australia.
Anne BernardQFAB Bioinformatics Institute for Molecular Bioscience University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia.
Vaughan MoutrieDepartment of Radiation Oncology Princess Alexandra Hospital Brisbane Queensland Australia.
Matthew FooteDepartment of Radiation Oncology Princess Alexandra Hospital Brisbane Queensland Australia; School of Medicine University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia.
Princess Alexandra Hospital · AUThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAccurate localisation is an essential component for the delivery of intracranial stereotactic treatment. For fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy, we compared the daily localisation accuracy of a standard thermoplastic mask with a new maxillary fixation device (MFD).

methodsDaily pre-treatment kV cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of 23 patients (12 localised in the MFD and 11 in the mask) with benign skull-based lesions were reviewed retrospectively. The set up accuracy was measured in 6° of freedom, to ascertain both individual and population random and systematic errors. The appropriate clinical target volume to planning target volume margin was computed from set up error data.

resultsA total of 682 CBCT scans were evaluated. Systematic (Σ) and random (σ) population errors were Σ = 0.8 mm, 0.2 mm and 0.2 mm and σ = 0.3 mm, 0.3 mm and 0.2 mm, respectively, for the standard mask in the left/right (LR), superior/inferior (SI), and anterior/posterior (AP) translational planes, and Σ = 0.2 mm, 0.1 mm and 0.2 mm and σ = 0.2 mm, 0.3 mm and 0.2 mm, respectively, for the MFD. There was a reduction in rotation errors in the MFD compared to the mask. Margin calculations suggested an isotropic margin could be safely reduced to 2 mm for the MFD.

conclusionThe two devices demonstrate similar daily positional accuracy for fractionated stereotactic treatment of intracranial lesions. Combined with daily image guidance and couch correction, either of these devices is a viable frameless option for fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy.

Indexed as

Dose Fractionation, RadiationHumansMaxillary NeoplasmsPatient PositioningRadiosurgeryReproducibility of ResultsRestraint, PhysicalSensitivity and SpecificityIntracranialradiotherapystereotactic

Identifiers

PMID27087974
PMCPMC4775825
OpenAlexW1912916855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.