Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27087945›Full record

ArticleUnited European gastroenterology journal2016

Nickel sensitization in patients with gastro-esophageal reflux disease.

Vincenzo Stanghellini, Cesare Tosetti, Edoardo Benedetto, Mario Condoluci, Rudi De Bastiani, Rosanna Cogliandro, Tecla Mastronuzzi, Manuela De Polo, Francesco Di Mita, Luigi Napoli and 7 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in United European gastroenterology journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Systemic Nickel Allergy Syndrome.American journal of medicine open · 2026
    Review
  2. A comprehensive summary of disease variants implicated in metal allergy.Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews · 2022
    Review
  3. The effect of a low-nickel diet and nickel sensitization on gastroesophageal reflux disease: A pilot study.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2021
    Article
  4. Editorial commentary on the Indian Journal of Gastroenterology - March-April 2021.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2021
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Vincenzo StanghelliniDepartment of Digestive Diseases and Internal Medicine, University of Bologna, Italy.
Cesare TosettiGeneral Practitioner and Gastroenterologist, Italian Group for Primary Care Gastroenterology (GIGA-CP), Italy.
Edoardo BenedettoGastroenterologist, Italian Group for Primary Care Gastroenterology (GIGA-CP), Rende, Italy.
Mario CondoluciAllergist, Vibo Valentia, Italy.
Rudi De BastianiGeneral Practitioner and Gastroenterologist, Italian Group for Primary Care Gastroenterology (GIGA-CP), Italy.
Rosanna CogliandroDepartment of Digestive Diseases and Internal Medicine, University of Bologna, Italy.
Tecla MastronuzziGeneral Practitioner and Gastroenterologist, Italian Group for Primary Care Gastroenterology (GIGA-CP), Italy.
Manuela De PoloGeneral Practitioner and Gastroenterologist, Italian Group for Primary Care Gastroenterology (GIGA-CP), Italy.
Francesco Di MitaGeneral Practitioner and Gastroenterologist, Italian Group for Primary Care Gastroenterology (GIGA-CP), Italy.
Luigi NapoliGeneral Practitioner and Gastroenterologist, Italian Group for Primary Care Gastroenterology (GIGA-CP), Italy.
Enzo UbaldiGeneral Practitioner and Gastroenterologist, Italian Group for Primary Care Gastroenterology (GIGA-CP), Italy.
Cristina NebiacolomboGeneral Practitioner and Gastroenterologist, Italian Group for Primary Care Gastroenterology (GIGA-CP), Italy.
Carmelo CottoneGeneral Practitioner and Gastroenterologist, Italian Group for Primary Care Gastroenterology (GIGA-CP), Italy.
Ignazio GrattaglianoGeneral Practitioner and Gastroenterologist, Italian Group for Primary Care Gastroenterology (GIGA-CP), Italy.
Maria ZamparellaGeneral Practitioner and Gastroenterologist, Italian Group for Primary Care Gastroenterology (GIGA-CP), Italy.
Elisabetta BaldiGeneral Practitioner and Gastroenterologist, Italian Group for Primary Care Gastroenterology (GIGA-CP), Italy.
Guido SannaGeneral Practitioner and Gastroenterologist, Italian Group for Primary Care Gastroenterology (GIGA-CP), Italy.
Società Italiana di Medicina Generale · ITUniversity of Bologna · ITConservatorio Torrefranca Vibo Valentia · ITItalian Society of Physiotherapy · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) leads to frequent medical visits, and available therapies fail in up to 40% of patients. Food allergies may be involved in GERD pathogenesis; however, allergens other than food have received little attention. Nickel allergy is common in the general population and some high-nickel foods are associated with GERD. However, the potential relationship between nickel allergy and GERD remains unaddressed.

aimThis study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of nickel sensitization in patients with and without GERD and to compare clinical and demographic features.

methodsThis prospective, multicenter study included 210 adult GERD patients and 140 patients without GERD who presented at the general practitioner. All GERD patients had undergone treatment with proton pump inhibitors and upper digestive endoscopy within the previous five years. Demographic and clinical data were collected by questionnaire and patients underwent a nickel patch allergy test.

resultsPatients with and without GERD presented similar characteristics, with the exception of nickel sensitization, which was significantly more prevalent among GERD patients than controls (39.5% vs. 16.4%; p = 0.001). Nickel-positive GERD patients were more frequently female (90.4% vs. 65.4%, p = 0.003) and asthmatic (18.1% vs. 4.7%; p = 0.038), compared to nickel-negative GERD patients. At six-month follow-up, most of the patients, with or without nickel sensitization, reported improved symptoms without differences in drug prescription.

conclusionNickel sensitization is particularly prevalent in GERD patients seen in general practice. Whether allergies other than food allergy play a role in GERD remains to be elucidated.

Indexed as

allergyfunctional gastrointestinal disordersGastro-esophageal reflux diseasenickelsymptoms

Identifiers

PMID27087945
PMCPMC4804365
OpenAlexW2280544972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.