Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27087935›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2016

18S rRNA V9 metabarcoding for diet characterization: a critical evaluation with two sympatric zooplanktivorous fish species.

Aitor Albaina, Mikel Aguirre, David Abad, María Santos, Andone Estonba

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The crossover from microscopy to genes in marine diversity: from species to assemblages in marine pelagic copepods.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aitor AlbainaLaboratory of Genetics Department of Genetics, Physical Anthropology & Animal Physiology University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU) Leioa 48940 Spain.
Mikel AguirreLaboratory of Genetics Department of Genetics, Physical Anthropology & Animal Physiology University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU) Leioa 48940 Spain.
David AbadLaboratory of Genetics Department of Genetics, Physical Anthropology & Animal Physiology University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU) Leioa 48940 Spain.
María SantosMarine Research Division AZTI Tecnalia Herrera Kaia Portualdea z/g P.O. Box 20110 Pasaia Gipuzkoa Spain.
Andone EstonbaLaboratory of Genetics Department of Genetics, Physical Anthropology & Animal Physiology University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU) Leioa 48940 Spain.
University of the Basque Country · ESTecnalia · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The potential of the 18S rRNA V9 metabarcoding approach for diet assessment was explored using MiSeq paired-end (PE; 2 × 150 bp) technology. To critically evaluate the method's performance with degraded/digested DNA, the diets of two zooplanktivorous fish species from the Bay of Biscay, European sardine (Sardina pilchardus) and European sprat (Sprattus sprattus), were analysed. The taxonomic resolution and quantitative potential of the 18S V9 metabarcoding was first assessed both in silico and with mock and field plankton samples. Our method was capable of discriminating species within the reference database in a reliable way providing there was at least one variable position in the 18S V9 region. Furthermore, it successfully discriminated diet between both fish species, including habitat and diel differences among sardines, overcoming some of the limitations of traditional visual-based diet analysis methods. The high sensitivity and semi-quantitative nature of the 18S V9 metabarcoding approach was supported by both visual microscopy and qPCR-based results. This molecular approach provides an alternative cost and time effective tool for food-web analysis.

Indexed as

18S rRNA V9diet analysismetabarcodingMiSeq paired‐end technologyplanktonSardina pilchardusSprattus sprattus

Identifiers

PMID27087935
PMCPMC4801955
OpenAlexW2288625043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.