Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27087926›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2016

Pseudocospeciation of the mycoparasite Cosmospora with their fungal hosts.

Cesar S Herrera, Yuuri Hirooka, Priscila Chaverri

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Natural Fungicolous Regulators ofMicroorganisms · 2020
    Article
  9. Endophytic Fungi of Olive Tree.Microorganisms · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Cesar S HerreraDepartment of Plant Science and Landscape Architecture University of Maryland 2112 Plant Sciences Building College Park Maryland 20742 United States.
Yuuri HirookaDepartment of Clinical Plant Science, Faculty of Bioscience Hosei University 3-7-2 Kajino-cho Koganei Tokyo Japan.
Priscila ChaverriDepartment of Plant Science and Landscape Architecture University of Maryland 2112 Plant Sciences Building College Park Maryland 20742 United States; Escuela de Biología Universidad de Costa Rica Apartado 11501-2060 San Pedro San José Costa Rica.
Hosei University · JPUniversidad de Costa Rica · CRUniversity of Maryland, College Park · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Species of Cosmospora are parasites of other fungi (mycoparasites), including species belonging to the Xylariales. Based on prior taxonomic work, these fungi were determined to be highly host specific. We suspected that the association of Cosmospora and their hosts could not be a result of random chance, and tested the cospeciation of Cosmospora and the their hosts with contemporary methods (e.g., ParaFit, PACo, and Jane). The cophylogeny of Cosmospora and their hosts was found to be congruent, but only host-parasite links in more recent evolutionary lineages of the host were determined as coevolutionary. Reconciliation reconstructions determined at least five host-switch events early in the evolution of Cosmospora. Additionally, the rates of evolution between Cosmospora and their hosts were unequal. This pattern is more likely to be explained by pseudocospeciation (i.e., host switches followed by cospeciation), which also produces congruent cophylogenies.

Indexed as

Ascomycotacoevolutionfungal hostfungal parasiteNectriaNectriaceae

Identifiers

PMID27087926
PMCPMC4775519
OpenAlexW2417365748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.