ArticleEcology and evolution2016
Evolutionary evidence on suitability of SecD as a target for development of antibacterial agents against Staphylococcus aureus.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Structure-based working model of SecDF, a proton-driven bacterial protein translocation factor.FEMS microbiology letters · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Staphylococcus aureus causes many infections and its drug resistance is a worrying challenge for medical care. The SecD subunit of Sec secretion system in methicillin-resistant S. aureus is an attractive target because SecD dysfunction leads to the death of bacteria and SecD as a target is more efficient than SecA and SecF. Evolution could have made SecD to become insensitive to antibacterial agents although the drugs directly against SecD have yet to develop. So far, no detailed information on SecD evolution has been available, thus 2686 SecD sequences with full taxonomic information from kingdom to species were analyzed. First, the variance of pairwise p-distance was evaluated for each taxonomic group. Second, the variance was further partitioned into intergroup and intragroup variances for quantification of horizontal and vertical gene transfer. Third, phylogenetic tree was built to trace the evolutionary pathway. The results showed that overall evolution of SecDs appears to have undergone horizontal and vertical gene transfer. Only 0.5% horizontal transfers were found between any two SecDs in S. aureus, 6.8% and 8.8% horizontal transfers were found between any two Staphylococcus SecDs from different and the same species, and only one SecD from S. aureus was located far away from its sister cluster. Thus, statistic and evolutionary analyses demonstrate that the SecDs from staphylococcus species have a small chance of mutating, and provide taxonomic evidence to use the SecD as a potential target for new generation of antibacterial agents against S. aureus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.