ArticleCellular and molecular bioengineering2015
Increased cell membrane capacitance is the dominant mechanism of stretch-dependent conduction slowing in the rabbit heart: a computational study.
Article in Cellular and molecular bioengineering, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evidence for a role of adverse sarcomere signaling in atrial fibrillation induction.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology plus · 2026Review
- Electrophysiological Evaluation of Post-Activation Potentiation/Post-Activation Performance Enhancement Using Strength-Duration Properties.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026Article
- Article
- Review
- Computationally efficient model of myocardial electromechanics for multiscale simulations.PloS one · 2021Article
- A survey of pathways for mechano-electric coupling in the atria.Progress in biophysics and molecular biology · 2021Article
- Sensitivity analysis of a strongly-coupled human-based electromechanical cardiac model: Effect of mechanical parameters on physiologically relevant biomarkers.Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering · 2020Article
- Computational Modeling of Electrophysiology and Pharmacotherapy of Atrial Fibrillation: Recent Advances and Future Challenges.Frontiers in physiology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Volume loading of the cardiac ventricles is known to slow electrical conduction in the rabbit heart, but the mechanisms remain unclear. Previous experimental and modeling studies have investigated some of these mechanisms, including stretch-activated membrane currents, reduced gap junctional conductance, and altered cell membrane capacitance. In order to quantify the relative contributions of these mechanisms, we combined a monomain model of rabbit ventricular electrophysiology with a hyperelastic model of passive ventricular mechanics. First, a simplified geometric model with prescribed homogeneous deformation was used to fit model parameters and characterize individual MEF mechanisms, and showed good qualitative agreement with experimentally measured strain-CV relations. A 3D model of the rabbit left and right ventricles was then compared with experimental measurements from optical electrical mapping studies in the isolated rabbit heart. The model was inflated to an end-diastolic pressure of 30 mmHg, resulting in epicardial strains comparable to those measured in the anterior left ventricular free wall. While the effects of stretch activated channels did alter epicardial conduction velocity, an increase in cellular capacitance was required to explain previously reported experimental results. The new results suggest that for large strains, various mechanisms can combine and produce a biphasic relationship between strain and conduction velocity. However, at the moderate strains generated by high end-diastolic pressure, a stretch-induced increase in myocyte membrane capacitance is the dominant driver of conduction slowing during ventricular volume loading.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.