ArticleStatistics in medicine2016
Targeted estimation and inference for the sample average treatment effect in trials with and without pair-matching.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01864603 (Sustainable East Africa Research in Community Health), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Sustainable East Africa Research in Community Health
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- On the mixed-model analysis of covariance in cluster-randomized trials.Statistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics · 2026Article
- Handling incomplete outcomes and covariates in cluster-randomized trials: doubly robust estimation, efficiency considerations, and sensitivity analysis.Biometrics · 2026Article
- Causal inference in randomized trials with partial clustering.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2025Article
- Blurring cluster randomized trials and observational studies: Two-Stage TMLE for subsampling, missingness, and few independent units.Biostatistics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Defining and estimating effects in cluster randomized trials: A methods comparison.Statistics in medicine · 2023Review
- Targeted maximum likelihood estimation of causal effects with interference: A simulation study.Statistics in medicine · 2022Article
- Selective inference for effect modification via the lasso.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology · 2022Article
- Effects of water quality, sanitation, handwashing, and nutritional interventions on child development in rural Kenya (WASH Benefits Kenya): a cluster-randomised controlled trial.The Lancet. Child & adolescent health · 2018Article
- "All Generalizations Are Dangerous, Even This One."-Alexandre Dumas.Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2017Article
- Review of Recent Methodological Developments in Group-Randomized Trials: Part 2-Analysis.American journal of public health · 2017Review
- Using a network-based approach and targeted maximum likelihood estimation to evaluate the effect of adding pre-exposure prophylaxis to an ongoing test-and-treat trial.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2017Article
- Semi-Parametric Estimation and Inference for the Mean Outcome of the Single Time-Point Intervention in a Causally Connected Population.Journal of causal inference · 2017Article
- TARGETED SEQUENTIAL DESIGN FOR TARGETED LEARNING INFERENCE OF THE OPTIMAL TREATMENT RULE AND ITS MEAN REWARD.Annals of statistics · 2017Article
- Adaptive pre-specification in randomized trials with and without pair-matching.Statistics in medicine · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In cluster randomized trials, the study units usually are not a simple random sample from some clearly defined target population. Instead, the target population tends to be hypothetical or ill-defined, and the selection of study units tends to be systematic, driven by logistical and practical considerations. As a result, the population average treatment effect (PATE) may be neither well defined nor easily interpretable. In contrast, the sample average treatment effect (SATE) is the mean difference in the counterfactual outcomes for the study units. The sample parameter is easily interpretable and arguably the most relevant when the study units are not sampled from some specific super-population of interest. Furthermore, in most settings, the sample parameter will be estimated more efficiently than the population parameter. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first paper to propose using targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE) for estimation and inference of the sample effect in trials with and without pair-matching. We study the asymptotic and finite sample properties of the TMLE for the sample effect and provide a conservative variance estimator. Finite sample simulations illustrate the potential gains in precision and power from selecting the sample effect as the target of inference. This work is motivated by the Sustainable East Africa Research in Community Health (SEARCH) study, a pair-matched, community randomized trial to estimate the effect of population-based HIV testing and streamlined ART on the 5-year cumulative HIV incidence (NCT01864603). The proposed methodology will be used in the primary analysis for the SEARCH trial. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.