Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27087478›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2016

Targeted estimation and inference for the sample average treatment effect in trials with and without pair-matching.

Laura B Balzer, Maya L Petersen, Mark J van der Laan, SEARCH Collaboration

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01864603 (Sustainable East Africa Research in Community Health), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01864603 nacompletednot on this map

Sustainable East Africa Research in Community Health

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2013 to 2021Enrolled150,395ConditionsHIV, Tuberculosis, Hypertension, DiabetesArmsUniversal ART in a streamlined care model, Annual Community Health Campaigns, Targeted PrEP and Targeted testing interventions, Baseline community-based HIV and multi-disease testing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. On the mixed-model analysis of covariance in cluster-randomized trials.Statistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Selective inference for effect modification via the lasso.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Laura B BalzerDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, 02115, MA, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0002-3730-410X
Maya L PetersenDivision of Biostatistics, University of California, Berkeley, 94110-7358, CA, U.S.A.
Mark J van der LaanDivision of Biostatistics, University of California, Berkeley, 94110-7358, CA, U.S.A.
SEARCH Collaboration

Funding

Reducing Failure-to-Initiate ART: Streamlined ART Start Strategy (START)U01AI099959 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HAVLIR, DIANE V · 2012 to 2016
$39.7M
San Francisco Vaccine and Prevention UnitUM1AI069496 · NIAID · PUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES · PI Susan Buchbinder, Diane V Havlir · 2012 to 2026
$30.5M
UCSF HIV Clinical Trials UnitUM1AI069502 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HAVLIR, DIANE V · 2012 to 2013
$10.3M
Targeted Learning using adaptive designs for HIV Epidemic control in East AfricaR01AI074345 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI PETERSEN, MAYA LIV, VANDERLAAN, MARK J · 2007 to 2023
$6.6M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI074345NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI099959NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI069496NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI069502PEPFAR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In cluster randomized trials, the study units usually are not a simple random sample from some clearly defined target population. Instead, the target population tends to be hypothetical or ill-defined, and the selection of study units tends to be systematic, driven by logistical and practical considerations. As a result, the population average treatment effect (PATE) may be neither well defined nor easily interpretable. In contrast, the sample average treatment effect (SATE) is the mean difference in the counterfactual outcomes for the study units. The sample parameter is easily interpretable and arguably the most relevant when the study units are not sampled from some specific super-population of interest. Furthermore, in most settings, the sample parameter will be estimated more efficiently than the population parameter. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first paper to propose using targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE) for estimation and inference of the sample effect in trials with and without pair-matching. We study the asymptotic and finite sample properties of the TMLE for the sample effect and provide a conservative variance estimator. Finite sample simulations illustrate the potential gains in precision and power from selecting the sample effect as the target of inference. This work is motivated by the Sustainable East Africa Research in Community Health (SEARCH) study, a pair-matched, community randomized trial to estimate the effect of population-based HIV testing and streamlined ART on the 5-year cumulative HIV incidence (NCT01864603). The proposed methodology will be used in the primary analysis for the SEARCH trial. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Indexed as

Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignHIV InfectionsHumansLikelihood Functionscluster randomized trialspair-matchingpopulation average treatment effect (PATE)sample average treatment effect (SATE)targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE)

Identifiers

PMID27087478
PMCPMC4965321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.