Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27087294›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of nursing studies2016

The effect of nurses' preparedness and nurse practitioner status on triage call management in primary care: A secondary analysis of cross-sectional data from the ESTEEM trial.

Anna Varley, Fiona C Warren, Suzanne H Richards, Raff Calitri, Katherine Chaplin, Emily Fletcher, Tim A Holt, Valerie Lattimer, Jamie Murdoch, David A Richards and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of nursing studies, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Uses of Virtual Care in Primary Care: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025
    Article
  4. Access systems in general practice: a systematic scoping review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Anna VarleyUniversity of East Anglia, United Kingdom. Electronic address: anna.varley@uea.ac.uk.
Fiona C WarrenUniversity of Exeter, United Kingdom.
Suzanne H RichardsUniversity of Exeter, United Kingdom.
Raff CalitriUniversity of Exeter, United Kingdom.
Katherine ChaplinUniversity of Bristol, United Kingdom.
Emily FletcherUniversity of Exeter, United Kingdom.
Tim A HoltUniversity of Oxford, United Kingdom.
Valerie LattimerUniversity of East Anglia, United Kingdom.
Jamie MurdochUniversity of East Anglia, United Kingdom.
David A RichardsUniversity of Exeter, United Kingdom.
John CampbellUniversity of Exeter, United Kingdom.

Funding

Department of Health 08/53/15
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNurse-led telephone triage is increasingly used to manage demand for general practitioner consultations in UK general practice. Previous studies are equivocal about the relationship between clinical experience and the call outcomes of nurse triage. Most research is limited to investigating nurse telephone triage in out-of-hours settings.

objectiveTo investigate whether the professional characteristics of primary care nurses undertaking computer decision supported software telephone triage are related to call disposition.

designQuestionnaire survey of nurses delivering the nurse intervention arm of the ESTEEM trial, to capture role type (practice nurse or nurse practitioner), prescriber status, number of years' nursing experience, graduate status, previous experience of triage, and perceived preparedness for triage. Our main outcome was the proportion of triaged patients recommended for follow-up within the practice (call disposition), including all contact types (face-to-face, telephone or home visit), by a general practitioner or nurse. SETTINGS: 15 general practices and 7012 patients receiving the nurse triage intervention in four regions of the UK.

participants45 nurse practitioners and practice nurse trained in the use of clinical decision support software.

methodsWe investigated the associations between nursing characteristics and triage call disposition for patient 'same-day' appointment requests in general practice using multivariable logistic regression modelling.

resultsValid responses from 35 nurses (78%) from 14 practices: 31/35 (89%) had ≥10 years' experience with 24/35 (69%) having ≥20 years. Most patient contacts (3842/4605; 86%) were recommended for follow-up within the practice. Nurse practitioners were less likely to recommend patients for follow-up odds ratio 0.19, 95% confidence interval 0.07; 0.49 than practice nurses. Nurses who reported that their previous experience had prepared them less well for triage were more likely to recommend patients for follow-up (OR 3.17, 95% CI 1.18-5.55).

conclusionNurse characteristics were associated with disposition of triage calls to within practice follow-up. Nurse practitioners or those who reported feeling 'more prepared' for the role were more likely to manage the call definitively. Practices considering nurse triage should ensure that nurses transitioning into new roles feel adequately prepared. While standardised training is necessary, it may not be sufficient to ensure successful implementation.

Indexed as

Nurse PractitionersNursing StaffAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInservice TrainingMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareTriageUnited KingdomYoung AdultClinical experienceConfidenceImplementationNurse telephone triagePrimary careTraining

Identifiers

PMID27087294
PMCPMC4845697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.