ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies2016
Primary care team communication networks, team climate, quality of care, and medical costs for patients with diabetes: A cross-sectional study.
Article in International journal of nursing studies, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Algorithmic Identification of the Daily Primary Frontline Clinician during Inpatient Medicine Encounters Using EHR Audit Log Data.Applied clinical informatics · 2026Article
- The impact of remuneration, extrinsic and intrinsic incentives on interprofessional primary care teams: results from a rapid scoping review.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Characterizing the Patterns of Electronic Health Record-Integrated Secure Messaging Use: Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Observational
- Article
- Article
- An integrative systematic review of employee silence and voice in healthcare: what are we really measuring?Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Review
- The teamwork structure, process, and context of a paediatric cardiac surgery team in Mongolia: A mixed-methods approach.The International journal of health planning and management · 2022Article
- Evaluating efficiency of counties in providing diabetes preventive care using data envelopment analysis.Health services & outcomes research methodology · 2021Article
- Lower HbA1c targets are associated with better metabolic control.European journal of pediatrics · 2021Article
- Which factors are related to Finnish home care workers' job satisfaction, stress, psychological distress and perceived quality of care? - a mixed method study.BMC health services research · 2020Article
- Article
- Professional Communication Networks and Job Satisfaction in Primary Care Clinics.Annals of family medicine · 2019Article
- Differences in Team Mental Models Associated With Medical Home Transformation Success.Annals of family medicine · 2019Article
- Putting the pieces together: EHR communication and diabetes patient outcomes.The American journal of managed care · 2018Observational
- Importance of a team approach to recommending the human papillomavirus vaccination.Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners · 2018Article
- Quantifying the Qualitative with Epistemic Network Analysis: A Human Factors Case Study of Task-Allocation Communication in a Primary Care Team.IISE transactions on healthcare systems engineering · 2018Article
- Nursing Practice in Primary Care and Patients' Experience of Care.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrimary care teams play an important role in providing the best quality of care to patients with diabetes. Little evidence is available on how team communication networks and team climate contribute to high quality diabetes care.
objectiveTo determine whether primary care team communication and team climate are associated with health outcomes, health care utilization, and associated costs for patients with diabetes.
methodsA cross-sectional survey of primary care team members collected information on frequency of communication with other care team members about patient care and on team climate. Patient outcomes (glycemic, cholesterol, and blood pressure control, urgent care visits, emergency department visits, hospital visit days, medical costs) in the past 12 months for team diabetes patient panels were extracted from the electronic health record. The data were analyzed using nested (clinic/team/patient) generalized linear mixed modeling.
participants155 health professionals at 6 U.S. primary care clinics participated from May through December 2013.
resultsPrimary care teams with a greater number of daily face-to-face communication ties among team members were associated with 52% (rate ratio=0.48, 95% CI: 0.22, 0.94) fewer hospital days and US$1220 (95% CI: -US$2416, -US$24) lower health-care costs per team diabetes patient in the past 12 months. In contrast, for each additional registered nurse (RN) who reported frequent daily face-to-face communication about patient care with the primary care practitioner (PCP), team diabetes patients had less-controlled HbA1c (Odds ratio=0.83, 95% CI: 0.66, 0.99), increased hospital days (RR=1.57, 95% CI: 1.10, 2.03), and higher healthcare costs (β=US$877, 95% CI: US$42, US$1713). Shared team vision, a measure of team climate, significantly mediated the relationship between team communication and patient outcomes.
conclusionsPrimary care teams which relied on frequent daily face-to-face communication among more team members, and had a single RN communicating patient care information to the PCP, had greater shared team vision, better patient outcomes, and lower medical costs for their diabetes patient panels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.