Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27086743›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and psychiatric sciences2017

Prevalence and severity of mental disorders in military personnel: a standardised comparison with civilians.

S Trautmann, L Goodwin, M Höfler, F Jacobi, J Strehle, P Zimmermann, H-U Wittchen

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Psychiatric exemptions at call-up and during military service: A comparative study.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

S TrautmannInstitute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy,Technische Universität Dresden,Dresden,Germany.
L GoodwinDepartment of Psychological Medicine,King's Centre for Military Health Research,Institute of Psychiatry,Psychology and Neuroscience,King's College London,London,UK.
M HöflerInstitute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy,Technische Universität Dresden,Dresden,Germany.
F JacobiInstitute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy,Technische Universität Dresden,Dresden,Germany.
J StrehleInstitute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy,Technische Universität Dresden,Dresden,Germany.
P ZimmermannCentre for Psychiatry and Posttraumatic Stress,Federal Armed Forces Hospital Berlin,Berlin,Germany.
H-U WittchenInstitute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy,Technische Universität Dresden,Dresden,Germany.
TU Dresden · DEKing's College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsProvision and need for mental health services among military personnel are a major concern across nations. Two recent comparisons suggest higher rates of mental disorders in US and UK military personnel compared with civilians. However, these findings may not apply to other nations. Previous studies have focused on the overall effects of military service rather than the separate effects of military service and deployment. This study compared German military personnel with and without a history of deployment to sociodemographically matched civilians regarding prevalence and severity of 12-month DSM-IV mental disorders.

method1439 deployed soldiers (DS), 779 never deployed soldiers (NS) and 1023 civilians were assessed with an adapted version of the Munich Composite International Diagnostic interview across the same timeframe. Data were weighted using propensity score methodology to assure comparability of the three samples.

resultsCompared with adjusted civilians, the prevalence of any 12-month disorder was lower in NS (OR: 0.7, 95% CI: 0.5-0.99) and did not differ in DS. Significant differences between military personnel and civilians regarding prevalence and severity of individual diagnoses were only apparent for alcohol (DS: OR: 0.3, 95% CI: 0.1-0.6; NS: OR: 0.2, 95% CI: 0.1-0.6) and nicotine dependence (DS: OR: 0.5, 95% CI: 0.3-0.6; NS: OR: 0.5, 95% CI: 0.3-0.7) with lower values in both military samples. Elevated rates of panic/agoraphobia (OR: 2.7, 95% CI: 1.4-5.3) and posttraumatic stress disorder (OR: 3.2, 95% CI: 1.3-8.0) were observed in DS with high combat exposure compared with civilians.

conclusionsRates and severity of mental disorders in the German military are comparable with civilians for internalising and lower for substance use disorders. A higher risk of some disorders is reduced to DS with high combat exposure. This finding has implications for mental health service provision and the need for targeted interventions. Differences to previous US and UK studies that suggest an overall higher prevalence in military personnel might result from divergent study methods, deployment characteristics, military structures and occupational factors. Some of these factors might yield valuable targets to improve military mental health.

Indexed as

Military PsychiatryAdultDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersGermanyHumansMental DisordersMiddle AgedMilitary PersonnelPrevalenceSeverity of Illness IndexSocioeconomic FactorsStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticEpidemiologymental healthmilitary psychiatryposttraumatic stress disorder

Identifiers

PMID27086743
PMCPMC6998688
OpenAlexW2338599735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.