Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27086312›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2016

Risk factors for current and future unmet supportive care needs of people with pancreatic cancer. A longitudinal study.

Vanessa L Beesley, Leesa F Wockner, Peter O'Rourke, Monika Janda, David Goldstein, Helen Gooden, Neil D Merrett, Dianne L O'Connell, Ingrid J Rowlands, David K Wyld and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A review, evaluation and content mapping study of Australian patient-facing online pancreatobiliary cancer resources.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Caring experiences of family caregivers of patients with pancreatic cancer: an integrative literature review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Using photography to explore psychological distress in patients with pancreatic cancer and their caregivers: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Vanessa L BeesleyPopulation Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia. Vanessa.Beesley@qimrberghofer.edu.au.
Leesa F WocknerPopulation Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.
Peter O'RourkePopulation Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.
Monika JandaSchool of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
David GoldsteinDepartment of Medical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Helen GoodenCancer Nursing Research Unit, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Neil D MerrettDiscipline of Surgery, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.
Dianne L O'ConnellCancer Research Division, Cancer Council New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Ingrid J RowlandsSchool of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
David K WyldDepartment of Medical Oncology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Rachel E NealePopulation Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aims to determine if the supportive care needs of people with pancreatic cancer change over time and identify the factors associated with current and future unmet needs.

methodsAustralian pancreatic cancer patients completed a self-administered survey at 0-6 months post-diagnosis (n = 116) then follow-up surveys 2 (n = 82) and 4 months (n = 50) later. The validated survey measured 34 needs across five domains. Weighted generalised estimating equations were used to identify factors associated with having ≥1 current or future moderate-to-high unmet need.

resultsThe overall proportion of patients reporting ≥1 moderate-or-high-level need did not significantly change over time (baseline = 70 % to 4 months = 75 %), although there was a non-significant reduction in needs for patients who had a complete resection (71 to 63 %) and an increase in patients with locally advanced (73 to 85 %) or metastatic (66 to 88 %) disease. Higher levels of pain (OR 6.1, CI 2.4-15.3), anxiety (OR 3.3, CI 1.5-7.3) and depression (OR 3.2, CI 1.7-6.0) were significantly associated with current needs. People with pain (OR 4.9, CI 1.5-15.4), metastatic disease (OR 2.7, CI 0.7-10.0) or anxiety (OR 2.5, CI 0.7-8.6) had substantially higher odds of reporting needs at their next survey. The prevalence of needs was highest in the physical/daily living and psychological domains (both 53 % at baseline). Pain and anxiety had respectively the strongest associations with these domains.

conclusionsCareful and continued attention to pain control and psychological morbidity is paramount in addressing significant unmet needs, particularly for people with metastatic disease. Research on how best to coordinate this is crucial.

Indexed as

AgedFemaleHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleNeeds AssessmentPancreatic NeoplasmsRisk FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesAnxietyDepressionLongitudinal studyPainPancreatic cancerRisk factorsUnmet supportive care needs

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.