Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27086034›Full record

ArticleArchives of dermatological research2016

Functional testing of topical skin formulations using an optimised ex vivo skin organ culture model.

G P Sidgwick, D McGeorge, A Bayat

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of dermatological research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Green Tea Catechins and Skin Health.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Recreating Human Skin In Vitro: Should the Microbiota Be Taken into Account?International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  9. A Novel Epidermis Model Using Primary Hidradenitis Suppurativa Keratinocytes.Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Advances in wound care · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

G P SidgwickPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery Research, Faculty of Medicine and Human Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Institute of Inflammation and Repair, University of Manchester, Stopford Building, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK.
D McGeorgeGrosvenor Nuffield Hospital, Wrexham Road, Chester, UK.
A BayatPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery Research, Faculty of Medicine and Human Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Institute of Inflammation and Repair, University of Manchester, Stopford Building, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK. ardeshir.bayat@manchester.ac.uk.
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A number of equivalent-skin models are available for investigation of the ex vivo effect of topical application of drugs and cosmaceuticals onto skin, however many have their drawbacks. With the March 2013 ban on animal models for cosmetic testing of products or ingredients for sale in the EU, their utility for testing toxicity and effect on skin becomes more relevant. The aim of this study was to demonstrate proof of principle that altered expression of key gene and protein markers could be quantified in an optimised whole tissue biopsy culture model. Topical formulations containing green tea catechins (GTC) were investigated in a skin biopsy culture model (n = 11). Punch biopsies were harvested at 3, 7 and 10 days, and analysed using qRT-PCR, histology and HPLC to determine gene and protein expression, and transdermal delivery of compounds of interest. Reduced gene expression of α-SMA, fibronectin, mast cell tryptase, mast cell chymase, TGF-β1, CTGF and PAI-1 was observed after 7 and 10 days compared with treated controls (p < 0.05). Histological analysis indicated a reduction in mast cell tryptase and chymase positive cell numbers in treated biopsies compared with untreated controls at day 7 and day 10 (p < 0.05). Determination of transdermal uptake indicated that GTCs were detected in the biopsies. This model could be adapted to study a range of different topical formulations in both normal and diseased skin, negating the requirement for animal models in this context, prior to study in a clinical trial environment.

Indexed as

ActinsAdministration, CutaneousAnimal Use AlternativesBiopsyCamellia sinensisCatechinChymasesConnective Tissue Growth FactorFibronectinsHumansImmunohistochemistryMast CellsOrgan Culture TechniquesPlant ExtractsPlasminogen Activator Inhibitor 1Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionACTA2 protein, humanActinsCatechinCCN2 protein, humanChymasesConnective Tissue Growth FactorFibronectinsPlant ExtractsPlasminogen Activator Inhibitor 1SERPINE1 protein, humanTransforming Growth Factor beta1TryptasesDermal deliveryDermatologyExtracellular matrixInflammationMast cellsSkin scarring

Identifiers

PMID27086034
PMCPMC4902832
OpenAlexW2337345648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.