Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27085754›Full record

SynthesisThe Journal of investigative dermatology2016

Risk of Serious Infections in Patients with Psoriasis on Biologic Therapies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Zenas Z N Yiu, Lesley S Exton, Zarif Jabbar-Lopez, M Firouz Mohd Mustapa, Eleanor J Samarasekera, A David Burden, Ruth Murphy, Caroline M Owen, Richard Parslew, Vanessa Venning and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Journal of investigative dermatology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Risk ofInternational journal of clinical practice · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Zenas Z N YiuDermatology Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK; Centre for Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, Manchester Pharmacy School, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Lesley S ExtonBritish Association of Dermatologists, London, UK.
Zarif Jabbar-LopezDepartment of Dermatology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK.
M Firouz Mohd MustapaBritish Association of Dermatologists, London, UK.
Eleanor J SamarasekeraNational Clinical Guideline Centre, Royal College of Physicians of London, London, UK.
A David BurdenDepartment of Dermatology, Western Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.
Ruth MurphySheffield University Teaching Hospitals and Sheffield Children's Hospitals, Sheffield, UK.
Caroline M OwenDepartment of Dermatology, East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust, Royal Blackburn Hospital, Blackburn, Lancashire, UK.
Richard ParslewDepartment of Dermatology, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Vanessa VenningDepartment of Dermatology, Oxford University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Darren M AshcroftCentre for Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, Manchester Pharmacy School, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Christopher E M GriffithsDermatology Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
Catherine H SmithSt John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. Electronic address: catherine.smith@kcl.ac.uk.
Richard B WarrenDermatology Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK. Electronic address: richard.warren@manchester.ac.uk.
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBBritish Association of Dermatologists · GBEast Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust · GBGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBOxford University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBRoyal College of Physicians · GBRoyal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital NHS Trust · GBRoyal Victoria Infirmary · GBSheffield Children's Hospital · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBWestern Infirmary · GB

Funding

Department of Health DRF-2015-08-089
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A comprehensive evaluation of the risk of serious infections in biologic therapies for psoriasis is lacking. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective cohort studies reporting serious infections in people taking any licensed biologic therapy for psoriasis compared with those taking placebo, nonbiologic therapy, or other biologic therapies. The quality of the studies was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria. No significant heterogeneity was detected in data from 32 RCTs (n = 13,359 participants) and one cohort study (n = 4,993 participants). In adults, low- to very-low-quality RCT data showed no significant difference between any biologic therapy and placebo at weeks 12-16 (overall pooled Peto odds ratio = 0.71, 95% confidence interval = 0.36-1.41) and weeks 20-30 (odds ratio = 2.27, 95% confidence interval = 0.45-11.49). No significant differences were found in any of the other comparisons in underpowered RCT data. Prospective cohort study data of low quality suggests that only adalimumab (adjusted hazard ratio [adjHR] = 2.52, 95% confidence interval = 1.47-4.32) was associated with a significantly higher risk of serious infection compared with retinoid and/or phototherapy in adults. No association between biologic therapies and serious infections in patients with psoriasis who were eligible for RCTs was detected. Further observational studies are needed to inform the uncertainty around this risk in the real world.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBiological ProductsBiological TherapyHumansInfectionsMethotrexateOdds RatioPhototherapyProportional Hazards ModelsPsoriasisRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRetinoidsRisk FactorsTime FactorsUstekinumabAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBiological ProductsMethotrexateRetinoidssecukinumabUstekinumab

Identifiers

PMID27085754
PMCPMC4946794
OpenAlexW2341137663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.