Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27085707›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2016

Detection and quantification of Wuchereria bancrofti and Brugia malayi DNA in blood samples and mosquitoes using duplex droplet digital polymerase chain reaction.

Jurairat Jongthawin, Pewpan M Intapan, Viraphong Lulitanond, Oranuch Sanpool, Tongjit Thanchomnang, Lakkhana Sadaow, Wanchai Maleewong

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. DetectingPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. DNA Diagnostics for Schistosomiasis Control.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2018
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jurairat JongthawinResearch and Diagnostic Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Pewpan M IntapanResearch and Diagnostic Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Viraphong LulitanondResearch and Diagnostic Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Oranuch SanpoolResearch and Diagnostic Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Tongjit ThanchomnangFaculty of Medicine, Mahasarakham University, Mahasarakham, Thailand.
Lakkhana SadaowResearch and Diagnostic Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Wanchai MaleewongResearch and Diagnostic Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand. wanch_ma@kku.ac.th.
Khon Kaen University · THMahasarakham University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lymphatic filariasis, a mosquito-borne disease, is still a major public health problem in tropical and sub-tropical countries. Effective diagnostic tools are required for identification of infected individuals, for epidemiological assessment, and for monitoring of control programs. A duplex droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) was conducted to differentiate and quantify Wuchereria bancrofti DNA by targeting the long DNA repeat (LDR) element and Brugia malayi DNA by targeting the HhaI element in blood samples and mosquito vectors. The analytical sensitivity and specificity were evaluated. Our results indicated that the duplex ddPCR assay could differentiate and quantify W. bancrofti and B. malayi DNA from blood samples and mosquitoes. DNA from a single larva in 50 μl of a blood sample, or in one mosquito vector, could be detected. The analytical sensitivity and specificity for W. bancrofti are both 100 %. Corresponding values for B. malayi are 100 and 98.3 %, respectively. Therefore, duplex ddPCR is a potential tool for simultaneous diagnosis and monitoring of bancroftian and brugian filariasis in endemic areas.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrugia malayiCatsCulicidaeDNA, HelminthDogsElephantiasis, FilarialHumansLarvaMalePolymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificityWuchereria bancroftiDNA, HelminthBrugia malayiDetectionDuplex droplet digital polymerase chain reactionLymphatic filariasisMosquito vectorsWuchereria bancrofti

Identifiers

PMID27085707
OpenAlexW2340424608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.