Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27085589›Full record

ArticleBehavioural brain research2016

Repeated exposure to amphetamine during adolescence alters inhibitory tone in the medial prefrontal cortex following drug re-exposure in adulthood.

Kush Paul, Shuo Kang, Charles L Cox, Joshua M Gulley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioural brain research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Peri-adolescent exposure to (meth)amphetamine in animal models.International review of neurobiology · 2022
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kush Paul *Neuroscience Program, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
Shuo Kang *Neuroscience Program, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
Charles L CoxNeuroscience Program, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
Joshua M GulleyNeuroscience Program, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.

Funding

Modulation of Subcortical Visual Information ProcessingR01EY014024 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI COX, CHARLES LEROY · 2003 to 2012
$2.6M
Mechanisms of amphetamine-induced plasticity in adolescents compared to adultsR01DA029815 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI GULLEY, JOSHUA M · 2011 to 2015
$1.5M
Modulation of Subcortical Visual Information ProcessingR56EY014024 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI COX, CHARLES LEROY · 2009 to 2009
$384k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY014024NEI NIH HHS R56 EY014024NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA029815
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Behavioral sensitization following repeated amphetamine (AMPH) exposure is associated with changes in GABA function in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). In rats exposed to AMPH during adolescence compared to adulthood, there are unique patterns of sensitization that may reflect age-dependent differences in drug effects on prefrontal GABAergic function. In the current study, we used a sensitizing regimen of repeated AMPH exposure in adolescent and adult rats to determine if a post-withdrawal AMPH challenge would alter inhibitory transmission in the mPFC in a manner that depends on age of exposure. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were treated with saline or 3mg/kg AMPH (i.p.) during adolescence [postnatal day (P) 27-P45] or adulthood (P85- P103) and were sacrificed either at similar ages in adulthood (∼P133; experiment 1) or after similar withdrawal times (3-4 weeks; experiment 2). Spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic currents (sIPSCs) were recorded in vitro from deep layer pyramidal cells in the mPFC using the whole-cell configuration. We found no effect of AMPH pre-exposure on baseline sIPSC frequency. Subsequent application of AMPH (25μM) produced a stable increase in sIPSC frequency in controls, suggesting that AMPH increases inhibitory tone in the mPFC. However, AMPH failed to increase sIPSCs in adolescent- or adult-exposed rats. In experiment 2, where withdrawal period was kept similar for both exposure groups, AMPH induced a suppression of sIPSC activity in adolescent-exposed rats. These results suggest that sensitizing treatment with AMPH during adolescence or adulthood dampens inhibitory influences on mPFC pyramidal cells, but potentially through different mechanisms.

Indexed as

AmphetamineAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsCentral Nervous System StimulantsInhibitory Postsynaptic PotentialsMalePatch-Clamp TechniquesPrefrontal CortexPyramidal CellsRats, Sprague-DawleyTissue Culture TechniquesAmphetamineCentral Nervous System StimulantsAdolescenceAmphetamineGABAMedial prefrontal cortexWhole-cell recording

Identifiers

PMID27085589
PMCPMC5149400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.