Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27085184›Full record

ArticleDNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes2016

Diversity and population-genetic properties of copy number variations and multicopy genes in cattle.

Derek M Bickhart, Lingyang Xu, Jana L Hutchison, John B Cole, Daniel J Null, Steven G Schroeder, Jiuzhou Song, Jose Fernando Garcia, Tad S Sonstegard, Curtis P Van Tassell and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Derek M BickhartUSDA-ARS, Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA derek.bickhart@ars.usda.gov george.liu@ars.usda.gov.
Lingyang XuUSDA-ARS, Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA Department of Animal and Avian Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
Jana L HutchisonUSDA-ARS, Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA.
John B ColeUSDA-ARS, Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA.
Daniel J NullUSDA-ARS, Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA.
Steven G SchroederUSDA-ARS, Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA.
Jiuzhou SongDepartment of Animal and Avian Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
Jose Fernando GarciaUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Tad S SonstegardUSDA-ARS, Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA.
Curtis P Van TassellUSDA-ARS, Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA.
Robert D SchnabelDivision of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA Informatics Institute, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Jeremy F TaylorDivision of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.
Harris A LewinDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
George E LiuUSDA-ARS, Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA derek.bickhart@ars.usda.gov george.liu@ars.usda.gov.
Agricultural Research Service · USUniversity of Maryland, College Park · USUniversity of Missouri · USUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diversity and population genetics of copy number variation (CNV) in domesticated animals are not well understood. In this study, we analysed 75 genomes of major taurine and indicine cattle breeds (including Angus, Brahman, Gir, Holstein, Jersey, Limousin, Nelore, and Romagnola), sequenced to 11-fold coverage to identify 1,853 non-redundant CNV regions. Supported by high validation rates in array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) and qPCR experiments, these CNV regions accounted for 3.1% (87.5 Mb) of the cattle reference genome, representing a significant increase over previous estimates of the area of the genome that is copy number variable (∼2%). Further population genetics and evolutionary genomics analyses based on these CNVs revealed the population structures of the cattle taurine and indicine breeds and uncovered potential diversely selected CNVs near important functional genes, including AOX1, ASZ1, GAT, GLYAT, and KRTAP9-1 Additionally, 121 CNV gene regions were found to be either breed specific or differentially variable across breeds, such as RICTOR in dairy breeds and PNPLA3 in beef breeds. In contrast, clusters of the PRP and PAG genes were found to be duplicated in all sequenced animals, suggesting that subfunctionalization, neofunctionalization, or overdominance play roles in diversifying those fertility-related genes. These CNV results provide a new glimpse into the diverse selection histories of cattle breeds and a basis for correlating structural variation with complex traits in the future.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsGenomeMultigene FamilyPolymorphism, GeneticAnimalsBreedingCattleGene Duplicationcattle genomecopy number variationindicinepopulation sequencingtaurine

Identifiers

PMID27085184
PMCPMC4909312
OpenAlexW2336072157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.