Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27084945›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2016

Protection of CpG islands from DNA methylation is DNA-encoded and evolutionarily conserved.

Hannah K Long, Hamish W King, Roger K Patient, Duncan T Odom, Robert J Klose

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 118 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Beyond the "Dominant" and "Recessive" Patterns of Inheritance.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Expansion of Sirtuin Gene Family in Gilthead Sea Bream (International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Role of SPRY4 in health and disease.Frontiers in oncology · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hannah K LongDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3QU, UK Molecular Haematology Unit, Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, OX3 9DS, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5694-0398
Hamish W KingDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3QU, UK.
Roger K PatientMolecular Haematology Unit, Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, OX3 9DS, UK.
Duncan T OdomCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK.
Robert J KloseDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3QU, UK rob.klose@bioch.ox.ac.uk.
John Radcliffe Hospital · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 20412Medical Research Council MC_U137981013Medical Research Council MC_UU_12009/8Wellcome Trust 098024/Z/11/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA methylation is a repressive epigenetic modification that covers vertebrate genomes. Regions known as CpG islands (CGIs), which are refractory to DNA methylation, are often associated with gene promoters and play central roles in gene regulation. Yet how CGIs in their normal genomic context evade the DNA methylation machinery and whether these mechanisms are evolutionarily conserved remains enigmatic. To address these fundamental questions we exploited a transchromosomic animal model and genomic approaches to understand how the hypomethylated state is formed in vivo and to discover whether mechanisms governing CGI formation are evolutionarily conserved. Strikingly, insertion of a human chromosome into mouse revealed that promoter-associated CGIs are refractory to DNA methylation regardless of host species, demonstrating that DNA sequence plays a central role in specifying the hypomethylated state through evolutionarily conserved mechanisms. In contrast, elements distal to gene promoters exhibited more variable methylation between host species, uncovering a widespread dependence on nucleotide frequency and occupancy of DNA-binding transcription factors in shaping the DNA methylation landscape away from gene promoters. This was exemplified by young CpG rich lineage-restricted repeat sequences that evaded DNA methylation in the absence of co-evolved mechanisms targeting methylation to these sequences, and species specific DNA binding events that protected against DNA methylation in CpG poor regions. Finally, transplantation of mouse chromosomal fragments into the evolutionarily distant zebrafish uncovered the existence of a mechanistically conserved and DNA-encoded logic which shapes CGI formation across vertebrate species.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAnimalsCell LineChromosomes, Human, Pair 21Conserved SequenceCpG IslandsDNADNA MethylationFemaleGene Expression RegulationHumansMaleMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicPromoter Regions, GeneticProtein BindingDNATranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID27084945
PMCPMC5001583
OpenAlexW2339611869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.