Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27084941›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2016

Is a fully wrapped SSB-DNA complex essential for Escherichia coli survival?

Vincent M Waldman, Elizabeth Weiland, Alexander G Kozlov, Timothy M Lohman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Slippage reconfiguration of trinucleotide repeat hairpins impedes resolution by human replication protein A.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Assessing Protein Dynamics on Low-Complexity Single-Stranded DNA Curtains.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Molecular insights into the prototypical single-stranded DNA-binding protein fromCritical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vincent M WaldmanDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 660 S. Euclid Avenue, Box 8231, 63110-1093, USA.
Elizabeth WeilandDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 660 S. Euclid Avenue, Box 8231, 63110-1093, USA.
Alexander G KozlovDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 660 S. Euclid Avenue, Box 8231, 63110-1093, USA.
Timothy M LohmanDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 660 S. Euclid Avenue, Box 8231, 63110-1093, USA lohman@biochem.wustl.edu.

Funding

SSB PROTEIN/DNA INTERACTIONSR01GM030498 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI LOHMAN, TIMOTHY M · 1985 to 2019
$7.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM030498
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Escherichia coli single-stranded DNA binding protein (SSB) is an essential homotetramer that binds ssDNA and recruits multiple proteins to their sites of action during genomic maintenance. Each SSB subunit contains an N-terminal globular oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide binding fold (OB-fold) and an intrinsically disordered C-terminal domain. SSB binds ssDNA in multiple modes in vitro, including the fully wrapped (SSB)65 and (SSB)56 modes, in which ssDNA contacts all four OB-folds, and the highly cooperative (SSB)35 mode, in which ssDNA contacts an average of only two OB-folds. These modes can both be populated under physiological conditions. While these different modes might be used for different functions, this has been difficult to assess. Here we used a dimeric SSB construct with two covalently linked OB-folds to disable ssDNA binding in two of the four OB-folds thus preventing formation of fully wrapped DNA complexes in vitro, although they retain a wild-type-like, salt-dependent shift in cooperative binding to ssDNA. These variants complement wild-type SSB in vivo indicating that a fully wrapped mode is not essential for function. These results do not preclude a normal function for a fully wrapped mode, but do indicate that E. coli tolerates some flexibility with regards to its SSB binding modes.

Indexed as

Binding SitesDNA, BacterialDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA DamageDNA, Single-StrandedEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsMicrobial ViabilityProtein BindingDNA, BacterialDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, Single-StrandedEscherichia coli ProteinsSSB protein, E coli

Identifiers

PMID27084941
PMCPMC4872115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.