Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27084929›Full record

ArticleLearning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)2016

Preexposure to salty and sour taste enhances conditioned taste aversion to novel sucrose.

Veronica L Flores, Anan Moran, Max Bernstein, Donald B Katz

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Veronica L FloresDepartment of Psychology, Program in Neuroscience, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts 02454, USA.
Anan MoranDepartment of Psychology, Program in Neuroscience, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts 02454, USA Volen Center for Complex Systems, Program in Neuroscience, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts 02454, USA Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel.
Max BernsteinDepartment of Psychology, Program in Neuroscience, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts 02454, USA Department of Biology, Program in Neuroscience, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts 02454, USA.
Donald B KatzDepartment of Psychology, Program in Neuroscience, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts 02454, USA Volen Center for Complex Systems, Program in Neuroscience, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts 02454, USA dbkatz@brandeis.edu.
Brandeis University · US

Funding

The amygdala-cortical loop as the basis of taste processingR01DC007703 · NIDCD · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI Donald B Katz · 2006 to 2026
$7.1M
Time and the forebrain coding of taste learning.R01DC006666 · NIDCD · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI KATZ, DONALD B · 2005 to 2025
$6.3M
Brain-Body-Behavior Interface in Learning and Development Across the LifespanT32GM084907 · NIGMS · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI SEKULER, ROBERT · 2009 to 2018
$1.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC006666NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC007703NIDCD NIH HHS R01DC6666NIDCD NIH HHS R01DC7703NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM084907
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conditioned taste aversion (CTA) is an intensively studied single-trial learning paradigm whereby animals are trained to avoid a taste that has been paired with malaise. Many factors influence the strength of aversion learning; prominently studied among these is taste novelty-the fact that preexposure to the taste conditioned stimulus (CS) reduces its associability. The effect of exposure to tastes other than the CS has, in contrast, received little investigation. Here, we exposed rats to sodium chloride (N) and citric acid (C), either before or within a conditioning session involving novel sucrose (S). Presentation of this taste array within the conditioning session weakened the resultant S aversion, as expected. The opposite effect, however, was observed when exposure to the taste array was provided in sessions that preceded conditioning: such experience enhanced the eventual S aversion-a result that was robust to differences in CS delivery method and number of tastes presented in conditioning sessions. This "non-CS preexposure effect" scaled with the number of tastes in the exposure array (experience with more stimuli was more effective than experience with fewer) and with the amount of exposure sessions (three preexposure sessions were more effective than two). Together, our results provide evidence that exposure and experience with the realm of tastes changes an animal's future handling of even novel tastes.

Indexed as

AnimalsAvoidance LearningConditioning, ClassicalDrinking BehaviorFemaleRatsRats, Long-EvansSucroseSweetening AgentsTasteTaste PerceptionTime FactorsWater DeprivationSucroseSweetening Agents

Identifiers

PMID27084929
PMCPMC4836633
OpenAlexW2336395881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.