Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27084877›Full record

ArticleClinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN2016

Provider Perspectives on Advance Care Planning for Patients with Kidney Disease: Whose Job Is It Anyway?

Ann M O'Hare, Jackie Szarka, Lynne V McFarland, Janelle S Taylor, Rebecca L Sudore, Ranak Trivedi, Lynn F Reinke, Elizabeth K Vig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 120 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Nephrology-Palliative Care Collaboration to Promote Outpatient Hemodialysis Goals of Care Conversations.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. "Don't Talk to Them About Goals of Care": Understanding Disparities in Advance Care Planning.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ann M O'HareCenter of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care.
Jackie SzarkaCenter of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care.
Lynne V McFarlandCenter of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care.
Janelle S TaylorAnthropology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Rebecca L SudoreDepartment of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, University of California, San Francisco, California.
Ranak TrivediCenter for Innovation to Implementation, Department of Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California; and.
Lynn F ReinkeCenter of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care.
Elizabeth K VigDepartments of Medicine and.
Orthopedic Specialty Hospital · USCenter for Innovation · USSan Francisco VA Medical Center · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesThere is growing interest in efforts to enhance advance care planning for patients with kidney disease. Our goal was to elicit the perspectives on advance care planning of multidisciplinary providers who care for patients with advanced kidney disease. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Between April and December of 2014, we conducted semistructured interviews at the Department of Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System with 26 providers from a range of disciplines and specialties who care for patients with advanced kidney disease. Participants were asked about their perspectives and experiences related to advance care planning in this population. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, and analyzed inductively using grounded theory.

resultsThe comments of providers interviewed for this study spoke to significant system-level barriers to supporting the process of advance care planning for patients with advanced kidney disease. We identified four overlapping themes: (1) medical care for this population is complex and fragmented across settings and providers and over time; (2) lack of a shared understanding and vision of advance care planning and its relationship with other aspects of care, such as dialysis decision making; (3) unclear locus of responsibility and authority for advance care planning; and (4) lack of active collaboration and communication around advance care planning among different providers caring for the same patients.

conclusionsThe comments of providers who care for patients with advanced kidney disease spotlight both the need for and the challenges to interdisciplinary collaboration around advance care planning for this population. Systematic efforts at a variety of organizational levels will likely be needed to support teamwork around advance care planning among the different providers who care for patients with advanced kidney disease.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelInterdisciplinary CommunicationPhysician's RoleAdultAdvance Care PlanningAgedDecision MakingDelivery of Health CareDieteticsFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicKidney Failure, ChronicMaleMiddle AgedNephrologyadvance care planningcare complexitychronic kidney diseasecommunicationcooperative behaviordecision makingend-of-lifegrounded theoryhumansmultidisciplinaryrenal dialysis

Identifiers

PMID27084877
PMCPMC4858488
OpenAlexW2336550761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.