Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27084874›Full record

ArticleClinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN2016

Provider Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Surrounding Conservative Management for Patients with Advanced CKD.

Sanah Parvez, Khaled Abdel-Kader, V Shane Pankratz, Mi-Kyung Song, Mark Unruh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Non-medical barriers reported by nephrologists when providing renal replacement therapy or comprehensive conservative management to end-stage kidney disease patients: a systematic review.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Establishing Research Priorities in Geriatric Nephrology: A Delphi Study of Clinicians and Researchers.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Choosing conservative care in advanced chronic kidney disease: a scoping review of patients' perspectives.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Experiences of US Nephrologists in the Delivery of Conservative Care to Patients With Advanced Kidney Disease: A National Qualitative Study.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Serious Illness Treatment Preferences for Older Adults with Advanced CKD.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sanah ParvezDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Khaled Abdel-KaderDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
V Shane PankratzDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Mi-Kyung SongNell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Mark UnruhDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, New Mexico.

Funding

Developing, Validating, and Implementing a CKD Predictive Model (DELVECKD)K23DK090304 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI ABDEL-KADER, KHALED A · 2011 to 2015
$861k
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK090304
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesDespite the potential benefits of conservative management, providers rarely discuss it as a viable treatment option for patients with advanced CKD. This survey was to describe the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of nephrologists and primary care providers regarding conservative management for patients with advanced CKD in the United States. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We developed a questionnaire on the basis of a literature review to include items assessing knowledge, attitudes, and self-reported practices of conservative management for patients with advanced CKD. Potential participants were identified using the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile. We then conducted a web-based survey between April and May of 2015.

resultsIn total, 431 (67.6% nephrologists and 32.4% primary care providers) providers completed the survey for a crude response rate of 2.7%. The respondents were generally white, men, and in their 30s and 40s. Most primary care provider (83.5%) and nephrology (78.2%) respondents reported that they were likely to discuss conservative management with their older patients with advanced CKD. Self-reported number of patients managed conservatively was >11 patients for 30.6% of nephrologists and 49.2% of primary care providers. Nephrologists were more likely to endorse difficulty determining whether a patient with CKD would benefit from conservative management (52.8% versus 36.2% of primary care providers), whereas primary care providers were more likely to endorse limited information on effectiveness (49.6% versus 24.5% of nephrologists) and difficulty determining eligibility for conservative management (42.5% versus 14.3% of nephrologists). There were also significant differences in knowledge between the groups, with primary care providers reporting more uncertainty about relative survival rates with conservative management compared with different patient groups.

conclusionsBoth nephrologists and primary care providers reported being comfortable with discussing conservative management with their patients. However, both provider groups identified lack of United States data on outcomes of conservative management and characteristics of patients who would benefit from conservative management as barriers to recommending conservative management in practice.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAttitude of Health PersonnelClinical CompetenceConservative TreatmentFemaleHealth Care SurveysHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansKidney Failure, ChronicMaleMiddle AgedNephrologyPatient ParticipationPractice Patterns, Physicians'Primary Health Careattitudechronic kidney diseasegeriatric nephrologyhemodialysishumansknowledgequality of liferenal insufficiency, chronicsurveys and questionnairessurvival

Identifiers

PMID27084874
PMCPMC4858478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.