Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27084851›Full record

ArticlePsychological science2016

Capturing the Interpersonal Implications of Evolved Preferences? Frequency of Sex Shapes Automatic, but Not Explicit, Partner Evaluations.

Lindsey L Hicks, James K McNulty, Andrea L Meltzer, Michael A Olson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Does support need to be seen? Daily invisible support promotes next day relationship well-being.Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43) · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lindsey L HicksDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University hicks@psy.fsu.edu.
James K McNultyDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University.
Andrea L MeltzerDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University.
Michael A OlsonDepartment of Psychology, University of Tennessee.
Florida State University · USUniversity of Tennessee at Knoxville · US

Funding

Differentiating between global and specific expectancies for a marriageR03HD058314 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE KNOXVILLE · PI MCNULTY, JAMES KEVIN · 2009 to 2010
$146k
NICHD NIH HHS R03 HD058314
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A strong predisposition to engage in sexual intercourse likely evolved in humans because sex is crucial to reproduction. Given that meeting interpersonal preferences tends to promote positive relationship evaluations, sex within a relationship should be positively associated with relationship satisfaction. Nevertheless, prior research has been inconclusive in demonstrating such a link, with longitudinal and experimental studies showing no association between sexual frequency and relationship satisfaction. Crucially, though, all prior research has utilized explicit reports of satisfaction, which reflect deliberative processes that may override the more automatic implications of phylogenetically older evolved preferences. Accordingly, capturing the implications of sexual frequency for relationship evaluations may require implicit measurements that bypass deliberative reasoning. Consistent with this idea, one cross-sectional and one 3-year study of newlywed couples revealed a positive association between sexual frequency and automatic partner evaluations but not explicit satisfaction. These findings highlight the importance of automatic measurements to understanding interpersonal relationships.

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsPersonal SatisfactionAdultFemaleHumansMaleSexual BehaviorSpousesautomatic processesevolved preferencesimplicit attitudesopen materialsrelationship satisfactionsex

Identifiers

PMID27084851
PMCPMC4899232
OpenAlexW2337839721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.