Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27084741›Full record

ReviewClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2016

Making Better Chimeric Antigen Receptors for Adoptive T-cell Therapy.

Marcela V Maus, Carl H June

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03792724 (Phase I-II Study of Intratumoral Urelumab Combined With Nivolumab in Patients With Solid Tumors), which is not on this map. Cited by 153 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
153citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
21.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03792724 phase1 / phase2unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Phase I-II Study of Intratumoral Urelumab Combined With Nivolumab in Patients With Solid Tumors

TypeinterventionalSponsorClinica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de NavarraRan2019 to 2023Enrolled32ConditionsNeoplasmsArmsUrelumab + Nivolumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

153 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 261 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Introduction to the Immune System.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. CAR-T Cell Therapy in Ovarian Cancer: Where Are We Now?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

93 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marcela V MausMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. mvmaus@mgh.harvard.edu cjune@exchange.upenn.edu.
Carl H JuneAbramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. mvmaus@mgh.harvard.edu cjune@exchange.upenn.edu.
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Designer antigen receptors to re-direct T cells to the NY-ESO-1 tumor antigenK08CA166039 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MAUS, MARCELA VALDERRAMA · 2012 to 2016
$747k
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA166039PHS HHS K08166039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chimeric antigen receptors (CAR) are engineered fusion proteins constructed from antigen recognition, signaling, and costimulatory domains that can be expressed in cytotoxic T cells with the purpose of reprograming the T cells to specifically target tumor cells. CAR T-cell therapy uses gene transfer technology to reprogram a patient's own T cells to stably express CARs, thereby combining the specificity of an antibody with the potent cytotoxic and memory functions of a T cell. In early-phase clinical trials, CAR T cells targeting CD19 have resulted in sustained complete responses within a population of otherwise refractory patients with B-cell malignancies and, more specifically, have shown complete response rates of approximately 90% in patients with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Given this clinical efficacy, preclinical development of CAR T-cell therapy for a number of cancer indications has been actively investigated, and the future of the CAR T-cell field is extensive and dynamic. Several approaches to increase the feasibility and safety of CAR T cells are currently being explored, including investigation into the mechanisms regulating the persistence of CAR T cells. In addition, numerous early-phase clinical trials are now investigating CAR T-cell therapy beyond targeting CD19, especially in solid tumors. Trials investigating combinations of CAR T cells with immune checkpoint blockade therapies are now beginning and results are eagerly awaited. This review evaluates several of the ongoing and future directions of CAR T-cell therapy.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy, AdoptiveRecombinant Fusion ProteinsAnimalsAntigens, CD19Antigens, NeoplasmCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyClinical Trials as TopicGenetic TherapyHumansImmunomodulationNeoplasmsReceptors, Antigen, T-CellAntigens, CD19Antigens, NeoplasmReceptors, Antigen, T-CellRecombinant Fusion Proteins

Identifiers

PMID27084741
PMCPMC4843171
OpenAlexW2340862784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.