Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27084704›Full record

Trial reportBMC urology2016

Probiotics [LGG-BB12 or RC14-GR1] versus placebo as prophylaxis for urinary tract infection in persons with spinal cord injury [ProSCIUTTU]: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Bonsan Bonne Lee, Swee-Ling Toh, Suzanne Ryan, Judy M Simpson, Kate Clezy, Laetitia Bossa, Scott A Rice, Obaydullah Marial, Gerard Weber, Jasbeer Kaur and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC urology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03019172 (Safety, and Effectiveness of Lactobacillus Reuteri for the Treatment of Urinary Tract Infections in Women), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03019172 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Safety, and Effectiveness of Lactobacillus Reuteri for the Treatment of Urinary Tract Infections in Women: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT)

TypeinterventionalSponsorInnovacion y Desarrollo de Estrategias en SaludRan2017 to 2017Enrolled40ConditionsUrinary Tract InfectionsArmsLactobacillus reuteri, Sachet with cranberry + placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. IntravesicalTherapeutic advances in urology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Bonsan Bonne LeeNeuroscience Research Australia [NeuRA] and the University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Swee-Ling TohDepartment of Spinal and Rehabilitation Medicine, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia. SweeLing.Toh@health.nsw.gov.au.
Suzanne RyanNeuroscience Research Australia [NeuRA] and the University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Judy M SimpsonSchool of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Kate ClezyDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Laetitia BossaNeuroscience Research Australia [NeuRA] and the University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Scott A RiceCentre for Marine Bio-Innovation, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Obaydullah MarialDepartment of Spinal and Rehabilitation Medicine, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Gerard WeberRoyal Rehabilitation Centre Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Jasbeer KaurRoyal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Claire Boswell-RuysNeuroscience Research Australia [NeuRA] and the University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Stephen GoodallCentre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation [CHERE], University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
James MiddletonJohn Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Kolling Institute, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia.
Mark TudehopeRoyal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
George KotsiouRoyal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Royal North Shore Hospital · AUUNSW Sydney · AUPrince of Wales Hospital · AUNeuroscience Research Australia · AUNorthern Sydney Local Health District · AURoyal Rehabilitation Centre · AUSingapore Centre for Environmental Life Sciences Engineering · SGUniversity of Sydney · AUUniversity of Technology Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUrinary tract infections [UTIs] are very common in people with Spinal Cord Injury [SCI]. UTIs are increasingly difficult and expensive to treat as the organisms that cause them become more antibiotic resistant. Among the SCI population, there is a high rate of multi-resistant organism [MRO] colonisation. Non-antibiotic prevention strategies are needed to prevent UTI without increasing resistance. Probiotics have been reported to be beneficial in preventing UTIs in post-menopausal women in several in vivo and in vitro studies. The main aim of this study is to determine whether probiotic therapy with combinations of Lactobacillus reuteri RC-14 + Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 [RC14-GR1] and/or Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG + Bifidobacterium BB-12 [LGG-BB12] are effective in preventing UTI in people with SCI compared to placebo.

methodThis is a multi-site randomised double-blind double-dummy placebo-controlled factorial design study conducted in New South Wales, Australia. All participants have a neurogenic bladder as a result of spinal injury. Recruitment started in April 2011. Participants are randomised to one of four arms, designed for factorial analysis of LGG-BB12 and/or RC14-GR1 v Placebo. This involves 24 weeks of daily oral treatment with RC14-GR1 + LGG-BB12, RC14-GR1 + placebo, LGG-BB12 + placebo or two placebo capsules. Randomisation is stratified by bladder management type and inpatient status. Participants are assessed at baseline, three months and six months for Short Form Health Survey [SF-36], microbiological swabs of rectum, nose and groin; urine culture and urinary catheters for subjects with indwelling catheters. A bowel questionnaire is administered at baseline and three months to assess effect of probiotics on bowel function. The primary outcome is time from randomisation to occurrence of symptomatic UTI. The secondary outcomes are change of MRO status and bowel function, quality of life and cost-effectiveness of probiotics in persons with SCI. The primary outcome will be analysed using survival analysis of factorial groups, with Cox regression modelling to test the effect of each treatment while allowing for the other, assuming no interaction effect. Hazard ratios and Kaplan-Meier survival curves will be used to summarise results. DISCUSSION: If these probiotics are shown to be effective in preventing UTI and MRO colonisation, they would be a very attractive alternative for UTI prophylaxis and for combating the increasing rate of antibiotic resistance after SCI.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry [ ACTRN 12610000512022 ]. Date of registration: 21 June 2010.

Indexed as

BifidobacteriumDouble-Blind MethodHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLacticaseibacillus rhamnosusLimosilactobacillus reuteriNew South WalesProbioticsProportional Hazards ModelsSpinal Cord InjuriesUrinary Bladder, NeurogenicUrinary Tract InfectionsAntibiotic resistanceBiofilmMicrobial community profilesMulti-resistant organismsProbioticsUrinary prophylaxis

Identifiers

PMID27084704
PMCPMC4833921
OpenAlexW2341525846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.