Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27084630›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2016

Investigating the Implications of a Variable RBE on Proton Dose Fractionation Across a Clinical Pencil Beam Scanned Spread-Out Bragg Peak.

Thomas I Marshall, Pankaj Chaudhary, Anna Michaelidesová, Jana Vachelová, Marie Davídková, Vladimir Vondráček, Giuseppe Schettino, Kevin M Prise

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. A High-Precision Method for In Vitro Proton Irradiation.International journal of particle therapy · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Thomas I MarshallCentre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University, Belfast, UK.
Pankaj ChaudharyCentre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University, Belfast, UK.
Anna MichaelidesováDepartment of Radiation Dosimetry, Nuclear Physics Institute CAS, Prague, Czech Republic; Proton Therapy Center Czech, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Dosimetry and Application of Ionizing Radiation, Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jana VachelováDepartment of Radiation Dosimetry, Nuclear Physics Institute CAS, Prague, Czech Republic.
Marie DavídkováDepartment of Radiation Dosimetry, Nuclear Physics Institute CAS, Prague, Czech Republic.
Vladimir VondráčekProton Therapy Center Czech, Prague, Czech Republic.
Giuseppe SchettinoRadiation Dosimetry, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK. Electronic address: giuseppe.schettino@npl.co.uk.
Kevin M PriseCentre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University, Belfast, UK.
Queen's University Belfast · GBCzech Academy of Sciences, Nuclear Physics Institute · CZProton Therapy Centre · CZNational Physical Laboratory · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G1100014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the clinical implications of a variable relative biological effectiveness (RBE) on proton dose fractionation. Using acute exposures, the current clinical adoption of a generic, constant cell killing RBE has been shown to underestimate the effect of the sharp increase in linear energy transfer (LET) in the distal regions of the spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP). However, experimental data for the impact of dose fractionation in such scenarios are still limited. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Human fibroblasts (AG01522) at 4 key depth positions on a clinical SOBP of maximum energy 219.65 MeV were subjected to various fractionation regimens with an interfraction period of 24 hours at Proton Therapy Center in Prague, Czech Republic. Cell killing RBE variations were measured using standard clonogenic assays and were further validated using Monte Carlo simulations and parameterized using a linear quadratic formalism.

resultsSignificant variations in the cell killing RBE for fractionated exposures along the proton dose profile were observed. RBE increased sharply toward the distal position, corresponding to a reduction in cell sparing effectiveness of fractionated proton exposures at higher LET. The effect was more pronounced at smaller doses per fraction. Experimental survival fractions were adequately predicted using a linear quadratic formalism assuming full repair between fractions. Data were also used to validate a parameterized variable RBE model based on linear α parameter response with LET that showed considerable deviations from clinically predicted isoeffective fractionation regimens.

conclusionsThe RBE-weighted absorbed dose calculated using the clinically adopted generic RBE of 1.1 significantly underestimates the biological effective dose from variable RBE, particularly in fractionation regimens with low doses per fraction. Coupled with an increase in effective range in fractionated exposures, our study provides an RBE dataset that can be used by the modeling community for the optimization of fractionated proton therapy.

Indexed as

Linear Energy TransferProtonsRelative Biological EffectivenessCell SurvivalColony-Forming Units AssayDose Fractionation, RadiationDose-Response Relationship, RadiationFibroblastsHumansMonte Carlo MethodProton TherapyUncertaintyProtons

Identifiers

PMID27084630
PMCPMC4838672
OpenAlexW2272905115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.