Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27084582›Full record

ArticleBrain research2016

Adolescent mice are less sensitive to the effects of acute nicotine on context pre-exposure than adults.

Munir Gunes Kutlu, David C Braak, Jessica M Tumolo, Thomas J Gould

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Brain research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Adolescent Cannabinoid and Nicotine Exposure Differentially Alters Adult Nicotine Self-Administration in Males and Females.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Munir Gunes KutluDepartment of Psychology, Neuroscience Program, Weiss Hall, Temple University, 1701 N. 13th St, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA. Electronic address: munir.kutlu@temple.edu.
David C BraakDepartment of Psychology, Neuroscience Program, Weiss Hall, Temple University, 1701 N. 13th St, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA.
Jessica M TumoloDepartment of Psychology, Neuroscience Program, Weiss Hall, Temple University, 1701 N. 13th St, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA.
Thomas J GouldDepartment of Psychology, Neuroscience Program, Weiss Hall, Temple University, 1701 N. 13th St, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA.
Temple University · US

Funding

Nicotine Addiction: Learning, Neural &Genetic ProcessR01DA017949 · NIDA · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI GOULD, THOMAS J · 2005 to 2015
$2.7M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA017949
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adolescence is a critical developmental period associated with both increased vulnerability to substance abuse and maturation of certain brain regions important for learning and memory such as the hippocampus. In this study, we employed a hippocampus-dependent learning context pre-exposure facilitation effect (CPFE) paradigm in order to test the effects of acute nicotine on contextual processing during adolescence (post-natal day (PND) 38) and adulthood (PND 53). In Experiment 1, adolescent or adult C57BL6/J mice received either saline or one of three nicotine doses (0.09, 0.18, and 0.36mg/kg) prior to contextual pre-exposure and testing. Our results demonstrated that both adolescent and adult mice showed CPFE in the saline groups. However, adolescent mice only showed acute nicotine enhancement of CPFE with the highest nicotine dose whereas adult mice showed the enhancing effects of acute nicotine with all three doses. In Experiment 2, to determine if the lack of nicotine's effects on CPFE shown by adolescent mice is specific to the age when they are tested, mice were either given contextual pre-exposure during adolescence or adulthood and received immediate shock and testing during adulthood after a 15day delay. We found that both adolescent and adult mice showed CPFE in the saline groups when tested during adulthood. However, like Experiment 1, mice that received contextual pre-exposure during adolescence did not show acute nicotine enhancement except at the highest dose (0.36mg/kg) whereas both low (0.09mg/kg) and high (0.36mg/kg) doses enhanced CPFE in adult mice. Finally, we showed that the enhanced freezing response found with 0.36mg/kg nicotine in the 15-day experiment may be a result of decreased locomotor activity as mice that received this dose of nicotine traveled shorter distances in an open field paradigm. Overall, our results indicate that while adolescent mice showed normal contextual processing when tested both during adolescence and adulthood, they are less sensitive to the enhancing effects of nicotine on contextual processing.

Indexed as

AgingAnimalsConditioning, PsychologicalDose-Response Relationship, DrugElectroshockExploratory BehaviorFearFreezing Reaction, CatalepticMice, Inbred C57BLModels, AnimalMotor ActivityNicotineNicotinic AgonistsPsychological TestsNicotineNicotinic AgonistsAdolescenceContextFear conditioningNicotine

Identifiers

PMID27084582
PMCPMC5755392
OpenAlexW2340124687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.