Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27084432›Full record

ArticleTranslational oncology2016

Radiomics Analysis on FLT-PET/MRI for Characterization of Early Treatment Response in Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Proof-of-Concept Study.

Jacob Antunes, Satish Viswanath, Mirabela Rusu, Laia Valls, Christopher Hoimes, Norbert Avril, Anant Madabhushi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Textural features of hypoxia PET predict survival in head and neck cancer during chemoradiotherapy.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2020
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jacob AntunesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Ave, Wickenden 525, Cleveland, OH 44106. Electronic address: jacob.antunes@case.edu.
Satish ViswanathDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Ave, Wickenden 525, Cleveland, OH 44106.
Mirabela RusuGeneral Electric Global Research, 1 Research Cir, Niskayuna, NY 12309.
Laia VallsDepartment of Radiology, Case Western Reserve University, Case Center for Imaging Research, 11000 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44106.
Christopher HoimesDepartment of Medicine, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center at the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, 11000 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44106.
Norbert AvrilDepartment of Medicine, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center at the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, 11000 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44106.
Anant MadabhushiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Ave, Wickenden 525, Cleveland, OH 44106.
Case Western Reserve University · USUniversity Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center · USGeneral Electric (United States) · US

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of ClevelandUL1TR000439 · NCATS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KONSTAN, MICHAEL W. · 2012 to 2016
$50.0M
TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH ONCOLOGY TRAINING GRANTK12CA076917 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI GERSON, STANTON L. · 1997 to 2022
$14.2M
Computerized histologic image predictor of cancer outcomeR01CA202752 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI FELDMAN, MICHAEL D, GANESAN, SHRIDAR · 2016 to 2020
$3.1M
Pathology Image Informatics Platform for visualization, analysis and managementU24CA199374 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI GURCAN, METIN NAFI, MADABHUSHI, ANANT · 2015 to 2019
$2.9M
Comprehensive quantitative ultrafast 3D liver MRIR01DK098503 · NIDDK · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI GULANI, VIKAS, SEIBERLICH, NICOLE · 2013 to 2017
$2.6M
Decision support with MRI for targeting, evaluating laser ablation for prostate cR21CA167811 · NCI · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI MADABHUSHI, ANANT · 2012 to 2013
$516k
Histologic image-based aggressiveness prediction in p16+ oropharyngeal carcinomaR21CA179327 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI MADABHUSHI, ANANT · 2014 to 2015
$389k
Computerized morphologic-molecular predictor of progression in DCISR21CA195152 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI BADVE, SUNIL S., MADABHUSHI, ANANT · 2015 to 2016
$388k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000439NCI NIH HHS K12 CA076917NCI NIH HHS R01 CA202752NCI NIH HHS R21 CA167811NCI NIH HHS R21 CA179327NCI NIH HHS R21 CA195152NCI NIH HHS U24 CA199374NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK098503
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studying early response to cancer treatment is significant for patient treatment stratification and follow-up. Although recent advances in positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allow for evaluation of tumor response, a quantitative objective assessment of treatment-related effects offers localization and quantification of structural and functional changes in the tumor region. Radiomics, the process of computerized extraction of features from radiographic images, is a new strategy for capturing subtle changes in the tumor region that works by quantifying subvisual patterns which might escape human identification. The goal of this study was to demonstrate feasibility for performing radiomics analysis on integrated PET/MRI to characterize early treatment response in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) undergoing sunitinib therapy. Two patients with advanced RCC were imaged using an integrated PET/MRI scanner. [18 F] fluorothymidine (FLT) was used as the PET radiotracer, which can measure the degree of cell proliferation. Image acquisitions included test/retest scans before sunitinib treatment and one scan 3 weeks into treatment using [18 F] FLT-PET, T2-weighted (T2w), and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) protocols, where DWI yielded an apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map. Our framework to quantitatively characterize treatment-related changes involved the following analytic steps: 1) intraacquisition and interacquisition registration of protocols to allow voxel-wise comparison of changes in radiomic features, 2) correction and pseudoquantification of T2w images to remove acquisition artifacts and examine tissue-specific response, 3) characterization of information captured by T2w MRI, FLT-PET, and ADC via radiomics, and 4) combining multiparametric information to create a map of integrated changes from PET/MRI radiomic features. Standardized uptake value (from FLT-PET) and ADC textures ranked highest for reproducibility in a test/retest evaluation as well as for capturing treatment response, in comparison to high variability seen in T2w MRI. The highest-ranked radiomic feature yielded a normalized percentage change of 63% within the RCC region and 17% in a spatially distinct normal region relative to its pretreatment value. By comparison, both the original and postprocessed T2w signal intensity appeared to be markedly less sensitive and specific to changes within the tumor. Our preliminary results thus suggest that radiomics analysis could be a powerful tool for characterizing treatment response in integrated PET/MRI.

Identifiers

PMID27084432
PMCPMC4833889
OpenAlexW2340118087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.