Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27084346›Full record

ReviewInsights into imaging2016

An ontogenetic approach to gynecologic malignancies.

Inês A Santiago, António P Gomes, Richard J Heald

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Insights into imaging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Inês A SantiagoRadiology Department, Champalimaud Foundation, Av. Brasília, 1400-038, Lisbon, Portugal. ines_agp_santiago@hotmail.com.
António P GomesB Surgery Department, Hospital Fernando Fonseca, E.P.E., IC19, 2720-276, Amadora, Portugal.
Richard J HealdColorectal Surgery Department, Champalimaud Foundation, Av. Brasília, 1400-038, Lisbon, Portugal.
Champalimaud Foundation · PTHospital Prof. Dr. Fernando Fonseca · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledOntogenetic anatomy is the mapping of body compartments established during early embryologic development, particularly well demarcated in the adult pelvis. Traditional cancer surgery is based on wide tumour excision with a safe margin, whereas the ontogenetic theory of local tumour spread claims that local dissemination is facilitated in the ontogenetic compartment of origin, but suppressed at its borders in the early stages of cancer development. Optimal local control of cancer is achieved by whole compartment resection with intact margins following ontogenetic "planes". The principles embodied in this hypothesis are most convincingly supported by the results of the implementation of total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer, and more recently, by innovative surgical approaches to gynaecologic malignancies. The high resolution contrast of MR, accurately delineating pelvic fascial compartments, makes it the best imaging modality for gynaecologic cancer surgery planning following these principles, but requires interpretation of imaging anatomy from a different perspective. TEACHING POINTS: • Ontogenetic anatomy refers to mapping of embryologically determined body compartments. • Ontogenetic theory claims tumour growth is not isometrical, but rather compartment permissive. • Ontogenetic principles are highly supported by the outcome results of total mesorectal excision. • Innovative gynaecologic cancer surgery approaches based on ontogenetic theory show promising results.

Indexed as

Gynaecologic cancerMR imagingOntogenetic anatomyOntogenetic surgeryTotal mesometrial excision

Identifiers

PMID27084346
PMCPMC4877347
OpenAlexW2336159220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.