Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27084344›Full record

ReviewIntensive care medicine2016

Clinical recommendations for pain, sedation, withdrawal and delirium assessment in critically ill infants and children: an ESPNIC position statement for healthcare professionals.

Julia Harris, Anne-Sylvie Ramelet, Monique van Dijk, Pavla Pokorna, Joke Wielenga, Lyvonne Tume, Dick Tibboel, Erwin Ista

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in Intensive care medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 143 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
143citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
67.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03572257 phase2 / phase3withdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial of Quetiapine as a Treatment for Delirium in Critically Ill Children

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedical College of WisconsinRan2019 to 2020Enrolled0ConditionsDeliriumArmsQuetiapine, Placebo
NCT05969483 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Validation of a Processed EEG Device (pEEG, Masimo Sedline®) as a Monitoring Tool for the Analgosedation Level in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Children

TypeobservationalSponsorAzienda Ospedaliera di PadovaRan2022 to 2025Enrolled150ConditionsSedation ComplicationArmspEEG monitoring
NCT07365215 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Pediatric Delirium in Swedish PICUs: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Validation of the Swedish Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium (CAPD) Instrument.

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUppsala UniversityRan2023 to 2025Enrolled676ConditionsPediatric Delirium, Pediatric Intensive Care, Risk Factors
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

143 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 418 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. [Evidence-based guideline for neonatal pain management in China (2023)].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2023
    Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Bispectral Index and COMFORT B Score for Sedation in Mechanically Ventilated Children: A Prospective Observational Study.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Clinician knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of delirium in patients with grade 3 bronchopulmonary dysplasia: A national survey.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

83 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Julia HarrisPICU Department of Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guys and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Anne-Sylvie RameletInstitute of Higher Education and Nursing Research, University of Lausanne, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Monique van DijkIntensive Care and Department of Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Office Sb-2704, P.O. Box 2060, 3000 CB, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Pavla PokornaIntensive Care and Department of Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Office Sb-2704, P.O. Box 2060, 3000 CB, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Joke WielengaDepartment of Intensive Care Neonatology, Emma Children's Hospital/Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lyvonne TumePICU and Children's Nursing Research Unit, Alder Hey Children's NHS FT, Liverpool UK and University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.
Dick TibboelIntensive Care and Department of Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Office Sb-2704, P.O. Box 2060, 3000 CB, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erwin IstaIntensive Care and Department of Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Office Sb-2704, P.O. Box 2060, 3000 CB, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. w.ista@erasmusmc.nl.
Erasmus MC - Sophia Children’s Hospital · NLEmma Kinderziekenhuis · NLGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Central Lancashire · GBUniversity of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis position statement provides clinical recommendations for the assessment of pain, level of sedation, iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome and delirium in critically ill infants and children. Admission to a neonatal or paediatric intensive care unit (NICU, PICU) exposes a child to a series of painful and stressful events. Accurate assessment of the presence of pain and non-pain-related distress (adequacy of sedation, iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome and delirium) is essential to good clinical management and to monitoring the effectiveness of interventions to relieve or prevent pain and distress in the individual patient.

methodsA multidisciplinary group of experts was recruited from the members of the European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC). The group formulated clinical questions regarding assessment of pain and non-pain-related distress in critically ill and nonverbal children, and searched the PubMed/Medline, CINAHL and Embase databases for studies describing the psychometric properties of assessment instruments. Furthermore, level of evidence of selected studies was assigned and recommendations were formulated, and grade or recommendations were added on the basis of the level of evidence.

resultsAn ESPNIC position statement was drafted which provides clinical recommendations on assessment of pain (n = 5), distress and/or level of sedation (n = 4), iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome (n = 3) and delirium (n = 3). These recommendations were based on the available evidence and consensus amongst the experts and other members of ESPNIC.

conclusionsThis multidisciplinary ESPNIC position statement guides professionals in the assessment and reassessment of the effectiveness of treatment interventions for pain, distress, inadequate sedation, withdrawal syndrome and delirium.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessPractice Guidelines as TopicChildChild, PreschoolConsensusDeliriumEmergence DeliriumHumansHypnotics and SedativesInfantInfant, NewbornIntensive Care UnitsPain ManagementPain MeasurementPsychomotor AgitationStress, PsychologicalHypnotics and SedativesAssessmentDeliriumDistressPainSedationWithdrawal syndrome

Identifiers

PMID27084344
PMCPMC4846705
OpenAlexW2337651269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.