Trial reportEuropean urology2017
Screening for Prostate Cancer Starting at Age 50-54 Years. A Population-based Cohort Study.
Trial report in European urology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Application and optimization of prostate-specific antigen screening strategy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a systematic review.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Trial
- Trial
- Eighteen-year follow-up of the Göteborg Randomized Population-based Prostate Cancer Screening Trial: effect of sociodemographic variables on participation, prostate cancer incidence and mortality.Scandinavian journal of urology · 2018Trial
- Global burden of prostate cancer (1990-2021) from Brazil: trends in disability-adjusted life years, incidence, mortality, and prevalence.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2026Article
- The 5-year outcomes of a regional population-based PSA information and testing programme.BJU international · 2026Article
- Men's experiences of the Swedish Organised Prostate Cancer Testing programme: a qualitative study.BJU international · 2025Article
- Review
- Men's Attitudes Towards Participation in Organised Prostate Cancer Testing: An Abductive Thematic Analysis.European urology open science · 2025Article
- [Early detection of prostate cancer-individualized, risk-adapted and successful].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Age limit for familial prostate cancer screening.Caspian journal of internal medicine · 2025Article
- The Role of Baseline Prostate-specific Antigen Value Prior to Age 60 in Predicting Lethal Prostate Cancer: Analysis of a Contemporary North American Cohort.European urology oncology · 2024Article
- Variation in harms and benefits of prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer by socio-clinical risk factors: A rapid review.BJUI compass · 2024Review
- Prediagnostic Prostate-specific Antigen Testing and Clinical Characteristics in Men with Lethal Prostate Cancer.European urology open science · 2024Article
- Semen Analysis in "Urology-Naïve" Patients: A Chance of Uroandrological Screening in Young Males.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Effects of stigma, anxiety and depression, and uncertainty in illness on quality of life in patients with prostate cancer: a cross-sectional analysis.BMC psychology · 2023Article
- Histopathological results of radical prostatectomy specimen of men younger than 50 years of age at the time of surgery: possible implications for prostate cancer screening programs?World journal of urology · 2023Article
- Article
- Screening for prostate cancer: evidence, ongoing trials, policies and knowledge gaps.BMJ oncology · 2023Review
- Correlation between periodontitis and prostate-specific antigen levels in the elderly Chinese male population.BMC oral health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCurrent prostate cancer screening guidelines conflict with respect to the age at which to initiate screening.
objectiveTo evaluate the effect of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening versus zero screening, starting at age 50-54 yr, on prostate cancer mortality. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsThis is a population-based cohort study comparing 3479 men aged 50 yr through 54 yr randomized to PSA-screening in the Göteborg population-based prostate cancer screening trial, initiated in 1995, versus 4060 unscreened men aged 51-55 yr providing cryopreserved blood in the population-based Malmö Preventive Project in the pre-PSA era, during 1982-1985. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Cumulative incidence and incidence rate ratios of prostate cancer diagnosis, metastasis, and prostate cancer death. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: At 17 yr, regular PSA-screening in Göteborg of men in their early 50s carried a more than two-fold higher risk of prostate cancer diagnosis compared with the unscreened men in Malmö (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 2.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.18, 3.02), but resulted in a substantial decrease in the risk of metastases (IRR 0.43, 95% CI 0.22, 0.79) and prostate cancer death (IRR 0.29, 95% CI 0.11, 0.67). There were 57 fewer prostate cancer deaths per 10000 men (95% CI 22, 92) in the screened group. At 17 yr, the number needed to invite to PSA-screening and the number needed to diagnose to prevent one prostate cancer death was 176 and 16, respectively. The study is limited by lack of treatment information and the comparison of the two different birth cohorts.
conclusionsPSA screening for prostate cancer can decrease prostate cancer mortality among men aged 50-54 yr, with the number needed to invite and number needed to detect to prevent one prostate cancer death comparable to those previously reported from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer for men aged 55-69 yr, at a similar follow-up. Guideline groups could consider whether guidelines for PSA screening should recommend starting no later than at ages 50-54 yr. PATIENT SUMMARY: Guideline recommendations about the age to start prostate-specific antigen screening could be discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.