Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27084245›Full record

Trial reportEuropean urology2017

Screening for Prostate Cancer Starting at Age 50-54 Years. A Population-based Cohort Study.

Sigrid Carlsson, Melissa Assel, David Ulmert, Axel Gerdtsson, Jonas Hugosson, Andrew Vickers, Hans Lilja

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European urology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Age limit for familial prostate cancer screening.Caspian journal of internal medicine · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sigrid CarlssonDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA; Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Göteborg, Sweden.
Melissa AsselDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
David UlmertMolecular Pharmacology and Chemistry Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, NY, USA; Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Axel GerdtssonDepartment of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Jonas HugossonDepartment of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Göteborg, Sweden; Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden.
Andrew VickersDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA. Electronic address: vickersa@mskcc.org.
Hans LiljaDepartment of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden; Departments of Laboratory Medicine, Surgery (Urology Service) and Medicine (Genitourinary Oncology), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA; Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. Electronic address: liljah@mskcc.org.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
SPORE In Prostate CancerP50CA092629 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI JAMES A EASTHAM · 2001 to 2026
$63.0M
Improving prostate cancer screening by integration of SNPs with blood biomarkersR01CA175491 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI KLEIN, ROBERT J. · 2013 to 2018
$2.8M
Prospective validation of a multi-marker prostate cancer prediction modelR01CA160816 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI BOORJIAN, STEPHEN, COOPERBERG, MATTHEW R · 2012 to 2015
$1.9M
Long-term prediction of prostate cancer death from kallikreins measured in bloodR33CA127768 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI LILJA, HANS GÖSTA · 2010 to 2011
$692k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P50 CA092629NCI NIH HHS R01 CA160816NCI NIH HHS R01 CA175491NCI NIH HHS R33 CA127768
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent prostate cancer screening guidelines conflict with respect to the age at which to initiate screening.

objectiveTo evaluate the effect of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening versus zero screening, starting at age 50-54 yr, on prostate cancer mortality. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsThis is a population-based cohort study comparing 3479 men aged 50 yr through 54 yr randomized to PSA-screening in the Göteborg population-based prostate cancer screening trial, initiated in 1995, versus 4060 unscreened men aged 51-55 yr providing cryopreserved blood in the population-based Malmö Preventive Project in the pre-PSA era, during 1982-1985. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Cumulative incidence and incidence rate ratios of prostate cancer diagnosis, metastasis, and prostate cancer death. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: At 17 yr, regular PSA-screening in Göteborg of men in their early 50s carried a more than two-fold higher risk of prostate cancer diagnosis compared with the unscreened men in Malmö (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 2.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.18, 3.02), but resulted in a substantial decrease in the risk of metastases (IRR 0.43, 95% CI 0.22, 0.79) and prostate cancer death (IRR 0.29, 95% CI 0.11, 0.67). There were 57 fewer prostate cancer deaths per 10000 men (95% CI 22, 92) in the screened group. At 17 yr, the number needed to invite to PSA-screening and the number needed to diagnose to prevent one prostate cancer death was 176 and 16, respectively. The study is limited by lack of treatment information and the comparison of the two different birth cohorts.

conclusionsPSA screening for prostate cancer can decrease prostate cancer mortality among men aged 50-54 yr, with the number needed to invite and number needed to detect to prevent one prostate cancer death comparable to those previously reported from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer for men aged 55-69 yr, at a similar follow-up. Guideline groups could consider whether guidelines for PSA screening should recommend starting no later than at ages 50-54 yr. PATIENT SUMMARY: Guideline recommendations about the age to start prostate-specific antigen screening could be discussed.

Indexed as

AgedAge FactorsCohort StudiesEarly Detection of CancerHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPractice Guidelines as TopicProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsRisk Reduction BehaviorProstate-Specific AntigenProstate cancerProstate-specific antigenScreening

Identifiers

PMID27084245
PMCPMC5061609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.