ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2016
Validation of the Spanish version of Mackey childbirth satisfaction rating scale.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient-Reported Levels of Satisfaction in Pain Management With Non-Pharmacological Measures During Pregnancy: A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial.Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.) · 2026Article
- The Childbirth Experience of Pregnant Women Living with HIV Virus.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Translation and Cross-Cultural Adaptation into French of the Birth Satisfaction Scale - Revised (BSS-R).Patient related outcome measures · 2025Article
- Childbirth experience assessment tools based on COSMIN guidelines: A systematic review.International journal of nursing sciences · 2025Review
- Article
- Article
- The Childbirth Experiences of Pregnant Women Living with HIV Virus: Scoping Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Psychometric assessment of the US person-centered prenatal and maternity care scales in a low-income predominantly Latinx population in California.BMC women's health · 2023Article
- A critical review: developing a birth integrity framework for epidemiological studies through meta-ethnography.BMC women's health · 2023Review
- Coping Strategies during Childbirth Related to Cultural Identity: Companionship, Choice of Analgesia and Maternal Satisfaction.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Consistency of Delivery Mode Increases Chinese Mothers' Maternal Satisfaction: The Effect of Perception of Support from Medical Staff and Mothers' Self-Efficacy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Satisfaction with the Care Received and the Childbirth and Puerperium Experience in Christian and Muslim Pregnant Women.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Content and Face Validity of the Mackey Childbirth Satisfaction Rating Scale Questionnaire Cross-culturally Adapted to Brazilian Portuguese.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2019Article
- Effectiveness of the doula program in Northern Taiwan.Tzu chi medical journalArticle
- Validation of a new tool for evaluating subjects' satisfaction with medicine package leaflets: a cross-sectional descriptive study.Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicinaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe "Mackey Childbirth Satisfaction Rating Scale" (MCSRS) is a complete non-validated scale which includes the most important factors associated with maternal satisfaction. Our primary purpose was to describe the internal structure of the scale and validate the reliability and validity of concept of its Spanish version MCSRS-E.
methodsThe MCSRS was translated into Spanish, back-translated and adapted to the Spanish population. It was then administered following a pilot test with women who met the study participant requirements. The scale structure was obtained by performing an exploratory factorial analysis using a sample of 304 women. The structures obtained were tested by conducting a confirmatory factorial analysis using a sample of 159 women. To test the validity of concept, the structure factors were correlated with expectations prior to childbirth experiences. McDonald's omegas were calculated for each model to establish the reliability of each factor. The study was carried out at four University Hospitals; Alicante, Elche, Torrevieja and Vinalopo Salud of Elche. The inclusion criteria were women aged 18-45 years old who had just delivered a singleton live baby at 38-42 weeks through vaginal delivery. Women who had difficulty speaking and understanding Spanish were excluded.
resultsThe process generated 5 different possible internal structures in a nested model more consistent with the theory than other internal structures of the MCSRS applied hitherto. All of them had good levels of validation and reliability.
conclusionsThis nested model to explain internal structure of MCSRS-E can accommodate different clinical practice scenarios better than the other structures applied to date, and it is a flexible tool which can be used to identify the aspects that should be changed to improve maternal satisfaction and hence maternal health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.