Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27084092›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2016

Validation of the Spanish version of Mackey childbirth satisfaction rating scale.

Pablo Caballero, Beatriz E Delgado-García, Isabel Orts-Cortes, Joaquin Moncho, Pamela Pereyra-Zamora, Andreu Nolasco

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Content and Face Validity of the Mackey Childbirth Satisfaction Rating Scale Questionnaire Cross-culturally Adapted to Brazilian Portuguese.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pablo CaballeroDepartment of Community Nursing, Preventive Medicine and Public Health and History of Science Health. Faculty of Health Sciences. University of Alicante, 03690 San Vicente del Raspeig, Alicante, Spain. pablo.caballero@ua.es.
Beatriz E Delgado-GarcíaObstetrics and Gynecology Service, University Hospital of Vinalopó, Alicante, Spain.
Isabel Orts-CortesDepartment of Nursing, University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
Joaquin MonchoDepartment of Community Nursing, Preventive Medicine and Public Health and History of Science Health. Faculty of Health Sciences. University of Alicante, 03690 San Vicente del Raspeig, Alicante, Spain.
Pamela Pereyra-ZamoraDepartment of Community Nursing, Preventive Medicine and Public Health and History of Science Health. Faculty of Health Sciences. University of Alicante, 03690 San Vicente del Raspeig, Alicante, Spain.
Andreu NolascoDepartment of Community Nursing, Preventive Medicine and Public Health and History of Science Health. Faculty of Health Sciences. University of Alicante, 03690 San Vicente del Raspeig, Alicante, Spain.
University of Alicante · ESHospital Universitario del Vinalopó · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe "Mackey Childbirth Satisfaction Rating Scale" (MCSRS) is a complete non-validated scale which includes the most important factors associated with maternal satisfaction. Our primary purpose was to describe the internal structure of the scale and validate the reliability and validity of concept of its Spanish version MCSRS-E.

methodsThe MCSRS was translated into Spanish, back-translated and adapted to the Spanish population. It was then administered following a pilot test with women who met the study participant requirements. The scale structure was obtained by performing an exploratory factorial analysis using a sample of 304 women. The structures obtained were tested by conducting a confirmatory factorial analysis using a sample of 159 women. To test the validity of concept, the structure factors were correlated with expectations prior to childbirth experiences. McDonald's omegas were calculated for each model to establish the reliability of each factor. The study was carried out at four University Hospitals; Alicante, Elche, Torrevieja and Vinalopo Salud of Elche. The inclusion criteria were women aged 18-45 years old who had just delivered a singleton live baby at 38-42 weeks through vaginal delivery. Women who had difficulty speaking and understanding Spanish were excluded.

resultsThe process generated 5 different possible internal structures in a nested model more consistent with the theory than other internal structures of the MCSRS applied hitherto. All of them had good levels of validation and reliability.

conclusionsThis nested model to explain internal structure of MCSRS-E can accommodate different clinical practice scenarios better than the other structures applied to date, and it is a flexible tool which can be used to identify the aspects that should be changed to improve maternal satisfaction and hence maternal health.

Indexed as

LanguagePatient SatisfactionTranslationsAdolescentAdultDelivery, ObstetricFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMiddle AgedParturitionPilot ProjectsPregnancyPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsChildbirth satisfactionLaborPsychometric behaviorReliabilitySurvey researchValidation

Identifiers

PMID27084092
PMCPMC4833934
OpenAlexW2337985919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.