Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27083780›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia research2016

Differential sensory fMRI signatures in autism and schizophrenia: Analysis of amplitude and trial-to-trial variability.

Sarah M Haigh, Akshat Gupta, Scott M Barb, Summer A F Glass, Nancy J Minshew, Ilan Dinstein, David J Heeger, Shaun M Eack, Marlene Behrmann

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Autism spectrum disorder and schizophrenia: An updated conceptual review.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Increased Reliability of Visually-Evoked Activity in Area V1 of the MECP2-Duplication Mouse Model of Autism.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Visual Influences on Auditory Behavioral, Neural, and Perceptual Processes: A Review.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2021
    Review
  13. Trial-to-Trial Variability in Electrodermal Activity to Odor in Autism.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sarah M HaighDepartment of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. Electronic address: haighsm@upmc.edu.
Akshat GuptaDepartment of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Scott M BarbSchool of Social Work, University of Pittsburgh, 2117 Cathedral of Learning, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.
Summer A F GlassSchool of Social Work, University of Pittsburgh, 2117 Cathedral of Learning, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.
Nancy J MinshewDepartment of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Ilan DinsteinPsychology Department, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, 653, Beer-Sheva, 84105, Israel.
David J HeegerDepartment of Psychology and Center for Neural Science, New York University, 6 Washington Place, New York, NY 10003, USA.
Shaun M EackSchool of Social Work, University of Pittsburgh, 2117 Cathedral of Learning, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Marlene BehrmannDepartment of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
University of Pittsburgh · USCarnegie Mellon University · USBen-Gurion University of the Negev · ILNew York University · US

Funding

Vision Core Grant- Design and Fabrication ModuleP30EY013079 · NEI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI MOVSHON, J ANTHONY · 2000 to 2025
$14.2M
SYSTEMS CONNECTIVITY + BRAIN ACTIVATION:IMAGING STUDIES OF LANGUAGE + PERCEPTIONP50HD055748 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI MINSHEW, NANCY J · 2007 to 2011
$9.7M
NEUROBIOLOGIC AND COGNITIVE MECHANISMS OF AUTISMP01HD035469 · NICHD · MELLON PITTS CORPORATION (MPC CORP) · PI MINSHEW, NANCY J · 1997 to 2001
$2.6M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY013079NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD035469NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD055748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autism and schizophrenia share multiple phenotypic and genotypic markers, and there is ongoing debate regarding the relationship of these two disorders. To examine whether cortical dynamics are similar across these disorders, we directly compared fMRI responses to visual, somatosensory and auditory stimuli in adults with autism (N=15), with schizophrenia (N=15), and matched controls (N=15). All participants completed a one-back letter detection task presented at fixation (to control attention) while task-irrelevant sensory stimulation was delivered to the different modalities. We focused specifically on the response amplitudes and the variability in sensory fMRI responses of the two groups, given the evidence of greater trial-to-trial variability in adults with autism. Both autism and schizophrenia individuals showed weaker signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) in sensory-evoked responses compared to controls (d>0.42), but for different reasons. For the autism group, the fMRI response amplitudes were indistinguishable from controls but were more variable trial-to-trial (d=0.47). For the schizophrenia group, response amplitudes were smaller compared to autism (d=0.44) and control groups (d=0.74), but were not significantly more variable (d<0.29). These differential group profiles suggest (1) that greater trial-to-trial variability in cortical responses may be specific to autism and is not a defining characteristic of schizophrenia, and (2) that blunted response amplitudes may be characteristic of schizophrenia. The relationship between the amplitude and the variability of cortical activity might serve as a specific signature differentiating these neurodevelopmental disorders. Identifying the neural basis of these responses and their relationship to the underlying genetic bases may substantially enlighten the understanding of both disorders.

Indexed as

AdultAttentionAutistic DisorderBrainFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeuropsychological TestsPerceptionPhysical StimulationPsychotic DisordersReaction TimeSchizophreniaYoung AdultAutismfMRISchizophreniaSensory perceptionVariability

Identifiers

PMID27083780
PMCPMC4958557
OpenAlexW2340110308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.